Cited by 703Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Research Studies

Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Open access
Hirsch, Fred R., Varella-Garcia, Marileila, Bunn, Paul A., Franklin, Wilbur A., Dziadziuszko, Rafal, Thatcher, Nick, Chang, Alex, Parikh, Purvish +11 more·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The phase III Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial compared gefitinib with placebo in 1,692 patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We analyzed ISEL tumor biopsy samples to examine relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcome after gefitinib treatment in a placebo-controlled setting. METHODS: Biomarkers included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 370); EGFR (n = 379) and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) protein expression (n = 382) by immunohistochemistry; and mutations in EGFR (n = 215), KRAS (n = 152), and BRAF (n = 118). RESULTS: High EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of a gefitinib-related effect on survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 for high copy number and HR, 1.16 for low copy number; comparison of high v low copy number HR, P = .045). EGFR protein expression was also related to clinical outcome (HR for positive, 0.77; HR for negative, 1.57; comparison of high v low protein expression HR, P = .049). Patients with EGFR mutations had higher response rates than patients without EGFR mutations (37.5% v 2.6%); there were insufficient data for survival analysis. No relationship was observed between p-Akt protein expression and survival outcome, and the limited amount of data collected for KRAS and BRAF mutations prevented any meaningful evaluation of clinical outcomes in relation to these mutations. CONCLUSION: EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of clinical benefit from gefitinib in ISEL. Additional studies are warranted to assess these biomarkers fully for the identification of patients most likely to benefit from gefitinib treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.06.3958

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirsch, F. R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., Franklin, W. A., Dziadziuszko, R., Thatcher, N., Chang, A., Parikh, P., Pereira, J. R., Ciuleanu, T., von Pawel, J., Watkins, C., Flannery, A., Ellison, G., Donald, E., Knight, L., Parums, D., Botwood, N., & Holloway, B.
Affiliations
  • Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
  • From the University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; Christie Hospital, Manchester; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; Johns Hopkins Singapore International Medical Center, Singapore; Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India; Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho Cancer Institute, São Paulo, Brazil; Oncology Institute Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; and Asklepios Fachkliniken, Gauting, Germany
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
24
Issue
31
Pages
5034-5042
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2107304950
Cited by
703
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 51
FWCI
79.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Association for Cancer Research
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
gefitinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR gene copy number, EGFR expression, EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, Akt phosphorylation, predictive biomarkers, survival outcomes, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Phosphorylation, Predictive Value of Tests, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Quinazolines, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, ras Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review