The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-Based Survey of Fertility Issues in Young Women With Breast Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Young women with breast cancer often seek advice about whether treatment will affect their fertility. We sought to gain a better understanding of women’s attitudes about fertility and how these concerns affect decision making. Patients and Methods: We developed a survey about fertility issues for young women with a history of early-stage breast cancer. The survey was e-mailed to all registered Young Survival Coalition survivor members (N = 1,702). E-mail reminders were used. Results: Six hundred fifty-seven eligible respondents completed the survey. Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 32.9 years; mean current age was 35.8 years. Ninety percent of women were white; 62% were married; 76% were college graduates. Stages at diagnosis were as follows: 0, 10%; I, 27%; II, 47%; III, 13%. Sixty-two percent of women were within 2 years of diagnosis. Fifty-seven percent recalled substantial concern at diagnosis about becoming infertile with treatment. In multivariate logistic regression, greater concern about infertility was associated with wish for children/more children (odds ratio [OR], 120; P < .0001), number of prior pregnancies (OR, 0.78; P = .01), and prior difficulty conceiving (OR, 1.86; P = .08). Twenty-nine percent of women reported that infertility concerns influenced treatment decisions. Seventy-two percent of women reported discussing fertility concerns with their doctors; 51% felt their concerns were addressed adequately. Women seemed to overestimate their risk of becoming postmenopausal with treatment. Conclusion: Fertility after treatment is a major concern for young women with breast cancer. There is a need to communicate with and educate young patients regarding fertility issues at diagnosis and a need for future research directed at preserving fertility for young breast cancer survivors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herrmann, C. (1997) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4 · Cited by 2,885
SPINHOVEN, P., ORMEL, J., SLOEKERS, P. P. A., KEMPEN, G. I. J. M., SPECKENS, A. E. M., & HEMERT, A. M. V. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291796004382 · Cited by 2,158
Cited by
Howard-Anderson, J., Ganz, P. A., Bower, J. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2012) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr541 · Cited by 830
Quality of Life Among Younger Women With Breast Cancer
Avis, N. E., Crawford, S., & Manuel, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.130 · Cited by 529
Fear of cancer recurrence: a systematic literature review of self‐report measures
Thewes, B., Butow, P., Zachariae, R., Christensen, S., Simard, S., & Gotay, C. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2070 · Cited by 262
the FCR Study Advisory Committee, Thewes, B., Butow, P., Bell, M. L., Beith, J., Stuart-Harris, R., Grossi, M., Capp, A., & Dalley, D. (2012) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1371-x · Cited by 213
Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer
Jassim, G. A., Whitford, D. L., Hickey, A., & Carter, B. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008729.pub2 · Cited by 163
Aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of endometriosis
Pavone, M. E., & Bulun, S. E. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.053 · Cited by 138
Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., Oyler, D. L., Armer, J. M., Cheng, A.-L., Cheng, M. X., Records, K., Udmuangpia, T., Carson, J. W., & Ann Bettencourt, B. (2020) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2020.1778150 · Cited by 76
Hormone replacement therapy and women with premature menopause–a cancer survivorship issue
King, J., Wynne, C. H., Assersohn, L., & Jones, A. (2011) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.007 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, A. H., Gelber, S., Peppercorn, J., Sampson, E., Knudsen, K., Laufer, M., Rosenberg, R., Przypyszny, M., Rein, A., & Winer, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-10-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4174-4183
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2146483619
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.