Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Thalidomide in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer

Dahut, William L., Gulley, James L., Arlen, Philip M., Liu, Yinong, Fedenko, Katherine M., Steinberg, Seth M., Wright, John J., Parnes, Howard, Chen, Clara C., Jones, Elizabeth, Parker, Catherine E., Linehan, W. Marston, Figg, William D.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Both docetaxel and thalidomide have demonstrated activity in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). We compared the efficacy of docetaxel to docetaxel plus thalidomide in patients with AIPC. Methods: Seventy-five patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic AIPC were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 30 mg/m 2 intravenously every week for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period (n = 25); or docetaxel at the same dose and schedule, plus thalidomide 200 mg orally each day (n = 50). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) consensus criteria and radiographic scans were used to determine the proportion of patients with a PSA decline, and time to progression. Results: After a median potential follow-up time of 26.4 months, the proportion of patients with a greater than 50% decline in PSA was higher in the docetaxel/thalidomide group (53% in the combined group, 37% in docetaxel-alone arm). The median progression-free survival in the docetaxel group was 3.7 months and 5.9 months in the combined group (P = .32). At 18 months, overall survival in the docetaxel group was 42.9% and 68.2% in the combined group. Toxicities in both groups were manageable after administration of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin in the combination group. Conclusion: In this randomized phase II trial, the addition of thalidomide to docetaxel resulted in an encouraging PSA decline rate and overall median survival rate in patients with metastatic AIPC. After the prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin was instituted to prevent venous thromboses, the combination regimen was well tolerated. Larger randomized trials are warranted to assess the impact of this combination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.05.074

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Dahut, W. L., Gulley, J. L., Arlen, P. M., Liu, Y., Fedenko, K. M., Steinberg, S. M., Wright, J. J., Parnes, H., Chen, C. C., Jones, E., Parker, C. E., Linehan, W. M., & Figg, W. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
13
Pages
2532-2539
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2153140330
Cited by
351
References
33
FWCI
31.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Thalidomide in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.05.074
The paper
Dahut, W. L., Gulley, J. L., Arlen, P. M., Liu, Y., Fedenko, K. M., Steinberg, S. M., Wright, J. J., Parnes, H., Chen, C. C., Jones, E., Parker, C. E., Linehan, W. M., & Figg, W. D. (2004). Randomized Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Thalidomide in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.05.074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.