The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pelvic Irradiation With Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Irradiation for High-Risk Cervical Cancer: An Update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial (RTOG) 90-01
Abstract
Purpose: To report mature results of a randomized trial that compared extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil and cisplatin (CTRT) in women with locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Patients and Methods: Four hundred three women with cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive either EFRT or CTRT. Patients were eligible if they had stage IIB to IVA disease, stage IB to IIA disease with a tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, or positive pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were stratified by stage and by method of lymph node evaluation. Results: The median follow-up time for 228 surviving patients was 6.6 years. The overall survival rate for patients treated with CTRT was significantly greater than that for patients treated with EFRT (67% v 41% at 8 years; P < .0001). There was an overall reduction in the risk of disease recurrence of 51% (95% CI, 36% to 66%) for patients who received CTRT. Patients with stage IB to IIB disease who received CTRT had better overall and disease-free survival than those treated with EFRT (P < .0001); 116 patients with stage III to IVA disease had better disease-free survival (P = .05) and a trend toward better overall survival (P = .07) if they were randomly assigned to CTRT. The rate of serious late complications of treatment was similar for the two treatment arms. Conclusion: Mature analysis confirms that the addition of fluorouracil and cisplatin to radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate of women with locally advanced cervical cancer without increasing the rate of late treatment-related side effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Rose, P. G., Ali, S., Watkins, E., Thigpen, J. T., Deppe, G., Clarke-Pearson, D. L., & Insalaco, S. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.4532 · Cited by 284
Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008285 · Cited by 275
SOX2 regulates radioresistance in cervical cancer via the hedgehog signaling pathway
Huang, C., Lu, H., Li, J., Xie, X., Fan, L., Wang, D., Tan, W., Wang, Y., Lin, Z., & Yao, T. (2018) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.005 · Cited by 51
Legge, F., Chiantera, V., Macchia, G., Fagotti, A., Fanfani, F., Ercoli, A., Gallotta, V., Morganti, A. G., Valentini, V., Scambia, G., et al. (2015) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.035 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Eifel, P. J., Winter, K., Morris, M., Levenback, C., Grigsby, P. W., Cooper, J., Rotman, M., Gershenson, D., & Mutch, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 872-880
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2097945491
- Cited by
- 1,018
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pelvic Irradiation With Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Irradiation for High-Risk Cervical Cancer: An Update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial (RTOG) 90-01. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.07.197
- The paper
- Eifel, P. J., Winter, K., Morris, M., Levenback, C., Grigsby, P. W., Cooper, J., Rotman, M., Gershenson, D., & Mutch, D. G. (2004). Pelvic Irradiation With Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Irradiation for High-Risk Cervical Cancer: An Update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial (RTOG) 90-01. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.07.197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.