The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory and Clinical Evidence of Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Sequential Treament With Gemcitabine Followed by Docetaxel in the Treatment of Sarcoma
Abstract
Purpose: A recent report of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel described favorable results in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. The objective of this report is to describe experience with this combination in a variety of histologic subtypes of sarcoma. Additionally, cell-culture studies were performed to assess the effect of the sequence of drug administration on colony formation. Patients and Methods: A medical record review of 35 patients receiving the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was undertaken. Gemcitabine 675 mg/m 2 intravenously was administered over 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 intravenously was administered over 60 minutes on day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Cell culture studies using the SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cell line and MCF-7 breast cancer cell line were also performed. Gemcitabine and docetaxel were added to cells either simultaneously for 24 hours, gemcitabine for 24 hours followed by docetaxel for 24 hours, or the reverse sequence. Results: Thirty-five patients were treated. Five complete responses and 10 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 43%. Responses occurred in uterine, extremity, and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, osteosarcomas, angiosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, malignant peripheral-nerve sheath tumors, and Ewing's sarcoma. In the cell culture studies, gemcitabine followed by docetaxel provided synergy. In contrast, the administration of drugs simultaneously resulted in antagonism, and docetaxel followed by gemcitabine provided mixed results. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel seems to be active in a variety of sarcomas. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial in soft tissue sarcoma comparing gemcitabine alone with this combination, is ongoing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Cited by
Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: State of the art
Longhi, A., Errani, C., De Paolis, M., Mercuri, M., & Bacci, G. (2006) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.05.005 · Cited by 631
Seddon, B., Strauss, S. J., Whelan, J., Leahy, M., Woll, P. J., Cowie, F., Rothermundt, C., Wood, Z., Benson, C., Ali, N., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30622-8 · Cited by 528
Lee, J. A., Jeon, D., Cho, W. H., Song, W. S., Yoon, H. S., Park, H. J., Park, B. K., Choi, H. S., Ahn, H. S., Lee, J. W., et al. (2016) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.26058 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leu, K. M., Ostruszka, L. J., Shewach, D., Zalupski, M., Sondak, V., Biermann, J. S., Lee, J. S.-J., Couwlier, C., Palazzolo, K., & Baker, L. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1706-1712
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2159885083
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory and Clinical Evidence of Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Sequential Treament With Gemcitabine Followed by Docetaxel in the Treatment of Sarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.043
- The paper
- Leu, K. M., Ostruszka, L. J., Shewach, D., Zalupski, M., Sondak, V., Biermann, J. S., Lee, J. S.-J., Couwlier, C., Palazzolo, K., & Baker, L. H. (2004). Laboratory and Clinical Evidence of Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Sequential Treament With Gemcitabine Followed by Docetaxel in the Treatment of Sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.