Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Separate Entity Requiring Specific Treatment

Open access
Hess, Viviane, A'Hern, Roger, Nasiri, Nazar, King, D. Michael, Blake, Peter R., Barton, Desmond P.J., Shepherd, John H., Ind, T., Bridges, J., Harrington, K., Kaye, Stanley B., Gore, Martin E.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the ovary (mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer [mEOC]) is a histologic subgroup of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Chemotherapy for mEOC is chosen according to guidelines established for EOC. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this is appropriate. Patients and Methods: Women with advanced mEOC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV) who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were compared with women with other histologic subtypes of EOC in a case-controlled study. Results: Eighty-one patients (27 cases, 54 controls) treated with platinum-based regimens were analyzed. The response rates for cases and controls were 26.3% (95% CI, 9.2% to 51.2%) and 64.9% (95% CI, 47.5% to 79.8%), respectively (P = .01). The odds ratio for complete or partial response to chemotherapy for mEOC was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.66; P = .009) compared with other histologic subtypes of EOC. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 9.6 months) versus 14.1 months (95% CI, 12.0 to 16.2 months; P < .001) and overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 15.6 months) versus 36.7 months (95% CI, 25.2 to 48.2 months; P < .001) for cases and controls, respectively. The hazard ratio for progression and death was 2.94 (95% CI, 1.71 to 5.07; P < .001) and 3.08 (95% CI, 1.69 to 5.6; P < .001), respectively, for mEOC patients as compared with controls. Conclusion: Patients with advanced mEOC have a poorer response to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy compared with patients with other histologic subtypes of EOC, and their survival is worse. Specific alternative therapeutic approaches should be sought for this group of patients, perhaps involving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.078

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Hess, V., A'Hern, R., Nasiri, N., King, D. M., Blake, P. R., Barton, D. P. J., Shepherd, J. H., Ind, T., Bridges, J., Harrington, K., Kaye, S. B., & Gore, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-03-15
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1040-1044
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2156691266
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Separate Entity Requiring Specific Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.078
The paper
Hess, V., A'Hern, R., Nasiri, N., King, D. M., Blake, P. R., Barton, D. P. J., Shepherd, J. H., Ind, T., Bridges, J., Harrington, K., Kaye, S. B., & Gore, M. E. (2004). Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Separate Entity Requiring Specific Treatment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.