Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intravenous Iron Optimizes the Response to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Related Anemia: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial

Auerbach, Michael, Ballard, Harold, Trout, J. Richard, McIlwain, Marilyn, Ackerman, Alan, Bahrain, Huzefa, Balan, Stefan, Barker, Lance, Rana, Jeevindra·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is the standard of care for patients with chemotherapy-related anemia. Intravenous (IV) iron improves hemoglobin (Hb) response and decreases dosage requirements in patients with anemia of kidney disease, but its effect has not been studied in randomized trials in cancer patients. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial enrolled 157 patients with chemotherapy-related anemia (Hb ≤ 105 g/L, serum ferritin ≤ 450 pmol/L or ≤ 675 pmol/L with transferrin saturation ≤ 19%) receiving subcutaneously rHuEPO 40,000 U once weekly to: (1) no-iron; (2) oral iron 325 mg twice daily; (3) iron dextran repeated 100mg IV bolus; or (4) iron dextran total dose infusion (TDI). Hb and quality of life (QOL) were measured at baseline and throughout. Results: All groups showed Hb (P < .0001) increases from baseline. Mean Hb increases for both IV iron groups were greater (P < .02) than for no-iron and oral iron groups. The percentage of patients with hematopoietic responses was higher (P < .01) in both IV iron groups (each case 68%) compared with no-iron (25%) and oral iron (36%) groups. IV iron groups showed increases in energy, activity, and overall QOL from baseline, compared with a decrease in energy and activity for no-iron group and no change in activity or overall QOL for oral iron group. Conclusion: rHuEPO increases Hb levels and improves QOL in patients with chemotherapy-related anemia. Magnitude of Hb increase and QOL improvement is significantly greater if IV iron is added.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.119

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Auerbach, M., Ballard, H., Trout, J. R., McIlwain, M., Ackerman, A., Bahrain, H., Balan, S., Barker, L., & Rana, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1301-1307
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2147453280
Cited by
414
References
0
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intravenous Iron Optimizes the Response to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Related Anemia: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.119
The paper
Auerbach, M., Ballard, H., Trout, J. R., McIlwain, M., Ackerman, A., Bahrain, H., Balan, S., Barker, L., & Rana, J. (2004). Intravenous Iron Optimizes the Response to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Related Anemia: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.