The DOI matches its Crossref record; 242 of the 242 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies
Open accessAbstract
Significant research and preclinical investment in cancer nanomedicine has produced several products, which have improved cancer care. Nevertheless, there exists a perception that cancer nanomedicine 'has not lived up to its promise' because the number of approved products and their clinical performance are modest. Many of these analyses do not consider the long clinical history and many clinical products developed from iron oxide nanoparticles. Iron oxide nanoparticles have enjoyed clinical use for about nine decades demonstrating safety, and considerable clinical utility and versatility. FDA-approved applications of iron oxide nanoparticles include cancer diagnosis, cancer hyperthermia therapy, and iron deficiency anemia. For cancer nanomedicine, this wealth of clinical experience is invaluable to provide key lessons and highlight pitfalls in the pursuit of nanotechnology-based cancer therapeutics. We review the clinical experience with systemic liposomal drug delivery and parenteral therapy of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) with iron oxide nanoparticles. We note that the clinical success of injectable iron exploits the inherent interaction between nanoparticles and the (innate) immune system, which designers of liposomal drug delivery seek to avoid. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia, a cancer therapy that harnesses magnetic hysteresis heating is approved for treating humans only with iron oxide nanoparticles. Despite its successful demonstration to enhance overall survival in clinical trials, this nanotechnology-based thermal medicine struggles to establish a clinical presence. We review the physical and biological attributes of this approach, and suggest reasons for barriers to its acceptance. Finally, despite the extensive clinical experience with iron oxide nanoparticles new and exciting research points to surprising immune-modulating potential. Recent data demonstrate the interactions between immune cells and iron oxide nanoparticles can induce anti-tumor immune responses. These present new and exciting opportunities to explore additional applications with this venerable technology. Clinical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles present poignant case studies of the opportunities, complexities, and challenges in cancer nanomedicine. They also illustrate the need for revised paradigms and multidisciplinary approaches to develop and translate nanomedicines into clinical cancer care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002 · cited 7×
“Perhaps the early (preclinical) successes of cancer drug-delivery nanomedicines were oversold, with promises that exceeded the pace of the science, prompting a range of reactions [7,9,27-32,37,268-274].”
BackgroundInfluentialMatsumura, Y., & Maeda, H. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 6,781
Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours
Wilhelm, S., Tavares, A. J., Dai, Q., Ohta, S., Audet, J., Dvorak, H. F., & Chan, W. C. W. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 · Cited by 5,218
Hepcidin Regulates Cellular Iron Efflux by Binding to Ferroportin and Inducing Its Internalization
Nemeth, E., Tuttle, M. S., Powelson, J., Vaughn, M. B., Donovan, A., Ward, D. M., Ganz, T., & Kaplan, J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104742 · Cited by 4,803
Doxil® — The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned
Barenholz, Y. (. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 · Cited by 4,792
Minotti, G., Menna, P., Salvatorelli, E., Cairo, G., & Gianni, L. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.2.6 · Cited by 3,778
The Effect of Nanoparticle Size, Shape, and Surface Chemistry on Biological Systems
Albanese, A., Tang, P. S., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124 · Cited by 3,633
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Coey, J. M. D. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108775052 · Cited by 3,178
Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease
Galluzzi, L., Buqué, A., Kepp, O., Zitvogel, L., & Kroemer, G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.107 · Cited by 3,119
Cited by
Magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications: A review
Materón, E. M., Miyazaki, C. M., Carr, O., Joshi, N., Picciani, P. H. S., Dalmaschio, C. J., Davis, F., & Shimizu, F. M. (2021) · Applied Surface Science Advances · doi:10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100163 · Cited by 456
An updated review of folate-functionalized nanocarriers: A promising ligand in cancer
Ebrahimnejad, P., Sodagar Taleghani, A., Asare-Addo, K., & Nokhodchi, A. (2022) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.11.011 · Cited by 133
Aram, E., Moeni, M., Abedizadeh, R., Sabour, D., Sadeghi-Abandansari, H., Gardy, J., & Hassanpour, A. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12203567 · Cited by 66
Conklin, B., Conley, B. M., Hou, Y., Chen, M., & Lee, K.-B. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114636 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Soetaert, F., Korangath, P., Serantes, D., Fiering, S., & Ivkov, R.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 163-164
- Pages
- 65-83
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037095003
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 242
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025
- The paper
- Soetaert, F., Korangath, P., Serantes, D., Fiering, S., & Ivkov, R. (2020). Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.