Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determinants of Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Cerebral Metastases

Fife, K.M., Colman, M.H., Stevens, G.N., Firth, I.C., Moon, D., Shannon, K.F., Harman, R., Petersen-Schaefer, K., Zacest, A.C., Besser, M., Milton, G.W., McCarthy, W.H., Thompson, J.F.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze prognostic factors, effects of treatment, and survival for patients with cerebral metastases from melanoma. Patients and Methods: All melanoma patients with cerebral metastases treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit between 1952 and 2000 were identified. From 1985 to 2000, patients were diagnosed and treated using consistent modern techniques and this cohort was analyzed in detail. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed. Results: A total of 1,137 patients with cerebral metastases were identified; 686 were treated between 1985 and 2000. For these 686 patients, the median time from primary diagnosis to cerebral metastasis was 3.1 years (range, 0 to 41 years). A total of 646 patients (94%) have died as a result of melanoma. The median survival from the time of diagnosis of cerebral metastasis was 4.1 months (range, 0 to 17.2 years). Treatment was as follows: surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, 158 patients; surgery alone, 47 patients; radiotherapy alone, 236 patients; and supportive care alone, 210 patients. Median survival according to treatment received for these four groups was 8.9, 8.7, 3.4, and 2.1 months, respectively; the differences between surgery and nonsurgery groups were statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, significant factors associated with improved survival were surgical treatment (P < .0001), no concurrent extracerebral metastases (P < .0001), younger age (P = .0007), and longer disease-free interval (P = .036). Prognostic factors analysis confirmed the important influence of patient selection on treatment received. Conclusion: This large series documents the characteristics of patients who developed cerebral metastases from melanoma. Median survival was dependent on treatment, which in turn was dependent on patient selection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.140

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Fife, K. M., Colman, M. H., Stevens, G. N., Firth, I. C., Moon, D., Shannon, K. F., Harman, R., Petersen-Schaefer, K., Zacest, A. C., Besser, M., Milton, G. W., McCarthy, W. H., & Thompson, J. F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1293-1300
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2160379492
Cited by
445
References
21
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Cerebral Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.140
The paper
Fife, K. M., Colman, M. H., Stevens, G. N., Firth, I. C., Moon, D., Shannon, K. F., Harman, R., Petersen-Schaefer, K., Zacest, A. C., Besser, M., Milton, G. W., McCarthy, W. H., & Thompson, J. F. (2004). Determinants of Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Cerebral Metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.