Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene Expression Profiles and Molecular Markers To Predict Recurrence of Dukes' B Colon Cancer

Wang, Yixin, Jatkoe, Tim, Zhang, Yi, Mutch, Matthew G., Talantov, Dmitri, Jiang, John, McLeod, Howard L., Atkins, David·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The 5-year survival rate of patients with Dukes' B colon cancer is approximately 75%. Identification of the patients at high risk of recurrence in this group would allow better staging and more informed use of adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we used DNA chip technology to systematically identify new prognostic markers for tumor relapse in Dukes' B patients. Patients and Methods: Using Affymetrix U133a GeneChip containing approximately 22,000 transcripts (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), RNA samples from 74 patients with Dukes' B colon cancer were analyzed. Thirty-one patients developed tumor relapse in less than 3 years, whereas 43 patients remained disease-free for more than 3 years after surgery. Two supervised class prediction approaches were used to identify gene markers that can best discriminate between patients who would experience relapse and patients who would remain disease-free. A multivariate Cox model was built to predict recurrence. Results: Gene expression profiling identified a 23-gene signature that predicts recurrence in Dukes'B patients. This signature was validated in 36 independent patients. The overall performance accuracy was 78%. Thirteen of 18 relapse patients and 15 of 18 disease-free patients were predicted correctly, giving an odds ratio of 13 (95% CI, 2.6 to 65; P = .003). The log-rank test indicated a significant difference in disease-free time between the predicted relapse and disease-free patients (P = .0001). Conclusion: The clinical value of these markers is that the patients at a high predicted risk of relapse (13-fold risk) could be upstaged to receive adjuvant therapy, similar to Dukes' C patients. Our data highlight the feasibility of a prognostic assay that could focus more intensive treatment for localized colon cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.186

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Jatkoe, T., Zhang, Y., Mutch, M. G., Talantov, D., Jiang, J., McLeod, H. L., & Atkins, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1564-1571
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2041413731
Cited by
460
References
3
FWCI
15.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Expression Profiles and Molecular Markers To Predict Recurrence of Dukes' B Colon Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.186
The paper
Wang, Y., Jatkoe, T., Zhang, Y., Mutch, M. G., Talantov, D., Jiang, J., McLeod, H. L., & Atkins, D. (2004). Gene Expression Profiles and Molecular Markers To Predict Recurrence of Dukes' B Colon Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.