Cited by 357Oral health in cancer treatmentEffects of Radiation ExposureHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Radionecrosis of the Jaw: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial From the ORN96 Study Group

Annane, Djillali, Depondt, Joël, Aubert, Philippe, Villart, Maryvonne, Géhanno, Pierre, Gajdos, Philippe, Chevret, Sylvie·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) for overt mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Patients and Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 12 university hospitals. Ambulatory adults with overt osteoradionecrosis of the mandible were assigned to receive 30 HBO exposures preoperatively at 2.4 absolute atmosphere for 90 minutes or a placebo, and 10 additional HBO dives postoperatively or a placebo. The main outcome measure was 1-year recovery rate from osteoradionecrosis. Secondary end points included time to treatment failure, time to pain relief, 1-year mortality rate, and treatment safety. Results: At the time of the second interim analysis, based on the triangular test, the study was stopped for potentially worse outcomes in the HBO arm. A total of 68 patients were enrolled and analyzed. At 1 year, six (19%) of 31 patients had recovered in the HBO arm and 12 (32%) of 37 in the placebo arm (relative risk = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.41; P = .23). Time to treatment failure (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.60; P = .41) and time to pain relief (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.89; P = .99) were similar between the two treatment arms. Conclusion: Patients with overt mandibular osteoradionecrosis did not benefit from hyperbaric oxygenation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.09.006

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a trial, patients with pronounced osteoradionecrosis of the mandible did not benefit from HBO.

    “The primary outcome measure was the 1‐year recovery rate from osteoradionecrosis, but the results showed that patients with pronounced osteoradionecrosis of the mandible did not benefit from HBO. 373”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annane, D., Depondt, J., Aubert, P., Villart, M., Géhanno, P., Gajdos, P., & Chevret, S.
Affiliations
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré (FR)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
22
Issue
24
Pages
4893-4900
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2166297968
Cited by
357
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 24
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
hyperbaric oxygen therapy, osteoradionecrosis of the jaw, mandible, radiotherapy complications, treatment failure, analgesia, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Hyperbaric Oxygenation, Male, Mandibular Diseases, Middle Aged, Osteoradionecrosis, Placebos, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review