Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial

Thomas, Xavier, Boiron, Jean-Michel, Huguet, Françoise, Dombret, Hervé, Bradstock, Ken, Vey, Norbert, Kovacsovics, Tibor, Delannoy, André, Fegueux, Nathalie, Fenaux, Pierre, Stamatoullas, Aspasia, Vernant, Jean-Paul, Tournilhac, Olivier, Buzyn, Agnès, Reman, Oumedaly, Charrin, Christiane, Boucheix, Claude, Gabert, Jean, Lhéritier, Véronique, Fiere, Denis·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the benefits of a risk-adapted postremission strategy in adult lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and re-evaluated stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for high-risk ALL. Patients and Methods: A total of 922 adult patients entered onto the trial according to risk groups: standard-risk ALL (group 1), high-risk ALL (group 2), Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (group 3), and CNS-positive ALL (group 4). All received a standard four-drug/4-week induction course. Patients from group 1 who achieved a complete remission (CR) after one course of induction therapy were randomly assigned between intensive and less intensive postremission chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved CR after salvage therapy were then included in group 2. Patients in groups 2, 3, and 4 with an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to allogeneic SCT. In groups 3 and 4, autologous SCT was offered to all other patients, whereas in group 2 they were randomly assigned between chemotherapy and autologous SCT. Results: Overall, 771 patients achieved CR (84%). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 17.5 months, with 3-year DFS at 37%. In group 1, the 3-year DFS rate was 41%, with no difference between arms of postremission randomization. In groups 2 and 4, the 3-year DFS rates were 38% and 44%, respectively. In group 2, autologous SCT and chemotherapy resulted in comparable median DFS. Patients with an HLA-matched sibling (groups 2 and 4) had improved DFS. Three-year DFS was 24% in group 3. Conclusion: Allogeneic SCT improved DFS in high-risk ALL in the first CR. Autologous SCT did not confer a significant benefit over chemotherapy for high-risk ALL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.10.050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, X., Boiron, J.-M., Huguet, F., Dombret, H., Bradstock, K., Vey, N., Kovacsovics, T., Delannoy, A., Fegueux, N., Fenaux, P., Stamatoullas, A., Vernant, J.-P., Tournilhac, O., Buzyn, A., Reman, O., Charrin, C., Boucheix, C., Gabert, J., Lhéritier, V., & Fiere, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-10-15
Volume
22
Issue
20
Pages
4075-4086
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2108008366
Cited by
550
References
0
FWCI
25.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.10.050
The paper
Thomas, X., Boiron, J.-M., Huguet, F., Dombret, H., Bradstock, K., Vey, N., Kovacsovics, T., Delannoy, A., Fegueux, N., Fenaux, P., Stamatoullas, A., Vernant, J.-P., Tournilhac, O., Buzyn, A., Reman, O., Charrin, C., Boucheix, C., Gabert, J., Lhéritier, V., & Fiere, D. (2004). Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.10.050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.