The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial
Abstract
Purpose: We analyzed the benefits of a risk-adapted postremission strategy in adult lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and re-evaluated stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for high-risk ALL. Patients and Methods: A total of 922 adult patients entered onto the trial according to risk groups: standard-risk ALL (group 1), high-risk ALL (group 2), Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (group 3), and CNS-positive ALL (group 4). All received a standard four-drug/4-week induction course. Patients from group 1 who achieved a complete remission (CR) after one course of induction therapy were randomly assigned between intensive and less intensive postremission chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved CR after salvage therapy were then included in group 2. Patients in groups 2, 3, and 4 with an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to allogeneic SCT. In groups 3 and 4, autologous SCT was offered to all other patients, whereas in group 2 they were randomly assigned between chemotherapy and autologous SCT. Results: Overall, 771 patients achieved CR (84%). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 17.5 months, with 3-year DFS at 37%. In group 1, the 3-year DFS rate was 41%, with no difference between arms of postremission randomization. In groups 2 and 4, the 3-year DFS rates were 38% and 44%, respectively. In group 2, autologous SCT and chemotherapy resulted in comparable median DFS. Patients with an HLA-matched sibling (groups 2 and 4) had improved DFS. Three-year DFS was 24% in group 3. Conclusion: Allogeneic SCT improved DFS in high-risk ALL in the first CR. Autologous SCT did not confer a significant benefit over chemotherapy for high-risk ALL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pui, C.-H., Robison, L. L., & Look, A. T. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60457-2 · Cited by 1,564
Huguet, F., Leguay, T., Raffoux, E., Thomas, X., Beldjord, K., Delabesse, E., Chevallier, P., Buzyn, A., Delannoy, A., Chalandon, Y., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.6916 · Cited by 567
Self-citationModern Therapy of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Bassan, R., & Hoelzer, D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.1382 · Cited by 485
Notch 1 activation in the molecular pathogenesis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
Grabher, C., von Boehmer, H., & Look, A. T. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1880 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, X., Boiron, J.-M., Huguet, F., Dombret, H., Bradstock, K., Vey, N., Kovacsovics, T., Delannoy, A., Fegueux, N., Fenaux, P., Stamatoullas, A., Vernant, J.-P., Tournilhac, O., Buzyn, A., Reman, O., Charrin, C., Boucheix, C., Gabert, J., Lhéritier, V., & Fiere, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-10-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4075-4086
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2108008366
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.10.050
- The paper
- Thomas, X., Boiron, J.-M., Huguet, F., Dombret, H., Bradstock, K., Vey, N., Kovacsovics, T., Delannoy, A., Fegueux, N., Fenaux, P., Stamatoullas, A., Vernant, J.-P., Tournilhac, O., Buzyn, A., Reman, O., Charrin, C., Boucheix, C., Gabert, J., Lhéritier, V., & Fiere, D. (2004). Outcome of Treatment in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Analysis of the LALA-94 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.10.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.