The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Palliative Care Inpatient Service in a Comprehensive Cancer Center: Clinical and Financial Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: Inpatient palliative care units are unavailable in most cancer centers and tertiary hospitals. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of the first 344 admissions to the Palliative Care Inpatient Service (PCIS) at our comprehensive cancer center. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our computerized database for clinical and demographic information, length of stay, and hospital billing during the first year of the service's operation. Results: Three hundred twenty patients were admitted during the study period. Their median age was 57 years. The main cancer diagnoses were thoracic or head and neck (44%), gastrointestinal (25%), and hematologic malignancy (8%). The main referral symptoms were pain (44%), nausea (41%), fatigue (39%), and dyspnea (38%). The median length of stay in the PCIS was 7 days (range, 1 to 58 days). Fifty-nine patients died while in the PCIS. However, the overall hospital mortality rate was not increased compared with that in the year before the establishment of the PCIS (3.58% v 3.59%). The mean reimbursement rate for all palliative care charges was approximately 57%, and the mean daily charges in the PCIS were 38% lower than the mean daily charges for the rest of the hospital. Symptom intensity data showed severe distress on admission and significant improvement in the main target symptoms. Most patients were discharged to a hospice. Conclusion: The PCIS has been accepted in our tertiary cancer center on the basis of its clinical utility and financial viability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of an Inpatient Palliative Care Team: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Gade, G., Venohr, I., Conner, D., McGrady, K., Beane, J., Richardson, R. H., Williams, M. P., Liberson, M., Blum, M., & Penna, R. D. (2008) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0055 · Cited by 564
Ferris, F. D., Bruera, E., Cherny, N., Cummings, C., Currow, D., Dudgeon, D., JanJan, N., Strasser, F., von Gunten, C. F., & Von Roenn, J. H. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.1558 · Cited by 396
Self-citationFadul, N., Elsayem, A., Palmer, J. L., Del Fabbro, E., Swint, K., Li, Z., Poulter, V., & Bruera, E. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24206 · Cited by 379
Self-citationThe Role of Chemotherapy at the End of Life: “When Is Enough, Enough?”
Harrington, S. E., & Smith, T. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.22.2667 · Cited by 280
Access to Palliative Care Among Patients Treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
Hui, D., Kim, S.-H., Kwon, J. H., Tanco, K. C., Zhang, T., Kang, J. H., Rhondali, W., Chisholm, G., & Bruera, E. (2012) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0192 · Cited by 218
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsayem, A., Swint, K., Fisch, M. J., Palmer, J. L., Reddy, S., Walker, P., Zhukovsky, D., Knight, P., & Bruera, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-05-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2008-2014
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2101701967
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Palliative Care Inpatient Service in a Comprehensive Cancer Center: Clinical and Financial Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.11.003
- The paper
- Elsayem, A., Swint, K., Fisch, M. J., Palmer, J. L., Reddy, S., Walker, P., Zhukovsky, D., Knight, P., & Bruera, E. (2004). Palliative Care Inpatient Service in a Comprehensive Cancer Center: Clinical and Financial Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.