Cited by 564Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Impact of an Inpatient Palliative Care Team: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gade, Glenn, Venohr, Ingrid, Conner, Douglas, McGrady, Kathleen, Beane, Jeffrey, Richardson, Robert H., Williams, Marilyn P., Liberson, Marcia +2 more·2008·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Palliative care improves care and reduces costs for hospitalized patients with life-limiting illnesses. There have been no multicenter randomized trials examining impact on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and subsequent health care costs. OBJECTIVE: Measure the impact of an interdisciplinary palliative care service (IPCS) on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and cost of care for 6 months posthospital discharge. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. IPCS provided consultative, interdisciplinary, palliative care to intervention patients. Controls received usual hospital care (UC). SETTING AND SAMPLE: Five hundred seventeen patients with life-limiting illnesses from a hospital in Denver, Portland, and San Francisco enrolled June 2002 to December 2003. MEASURES: Modified City of Hope Patient Questionnaire, total health care costs, hospice utilization, and survival. RESULTS: IPCS reported higher scores for the Care Experience scale (IPCS: 6.9 versus UC: 6.6, p = 0.04) and for the Doctors, Nurses/Other Care Providers Communication scale (IPCS: 8.3 versus UC: 7.5, p = 0.0004). IPCS patients had fewer intensive care admissions (ICU) on hospital readmission (12 versus 21, p = 0.04), and lower 6-month net cost savings of $4,855 per patient (p = 0.001). IPCS had longer median hospice stays (24 days versus 12 days, p = 0.04). There were no differences in survival or symptom control. CONCLUSIONS: IPCS patients reported greater satisfaction with their care experience and providers' communication, had fewer ICU admissions on readmission, and lower total health care costs following hospital discharge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2007.0055

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gade, G., Venohr, I., Conner, D., McGrady, K., Beane, J., Richardson, R. H., Williams, M. P., Liberson, M., Blum, M., & Penna, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Colorado Permanente Medical Group (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Kaiser Foundation Hospital (US)
  • Palliative Care Service, Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, California.
  • Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2008-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
180-190
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1987578786
Cited by
564
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 26
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
palliative care, inpatient palliative care, life-limiting illness, patient satisfaction, health care costs, hospital readmission, intensive care unit admission, hospice use, physician-patient communication, post-discharge outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Cooperative Behavior, Hospitalization, Humans, Palliative Care, Patient Care Team, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Survival Rate, Advance Directives, Critical Illness, Hospice Care, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review