The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cetuximab, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, in Combination With Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Trial
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the response rate, time to disease progression, survival duration and rate, and toxicity with the combination of cetuximab and gemcitabine in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with measurable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had never received chemotherapy for their advanced disease and had immunohistochemical evidence of EGFR expression were eligible for the multicenter phase II trial. Patients were treated with cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m 2, followed by 250 mg/m 2 weekly for 7 weeks. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m 2 for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. In subsequent cycles, cetuximab was administered weekly, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. Results: Sixty-one patients were screened for EGFR expression, 58 patients (95%) had at least 1+ staining, and 41 were enrolled onto the trial. Five patients (12.2%) achieved a partial response, and 26 (63.4%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 3.8 months, and the median overall survival duration was 7.1 months. One-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 12% and 31.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (39.0%), asthenia (22.0%), abdominal pain (22.0%), and thrombocytopenia (17.1%). Conclusion: Cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine showed promising activity against advanced pancreatic cancer. Further clinical investigation is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moore, M. J., Goldstein, D., Hamm, J., Figer, A., Hecht, J. R., Gallinger, S., Au, H. J., Murawa, P., Walde, D., Wolff, R. A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.9525 · Cited by 3,848
Self-citationEGFR Antagonists in Cancer Treatment
Ciardiello, F., & Tortora, G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0707704 · Cited by 2,058
Philip, P. A., Benedetti, J., Corless, C. L., Wong, R., O'Reilly, E. M., Flynn, P. J., Rowland, K. M., Atkins, J. N., Mirtsching, B. C., Rivkin, S. E., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.7550 · Cited by 632
Self-citationLacouture, M. E., Anadkat, M. J., Bensadoun, R.-J., Bryce, J., Chan, A., Epstein, J. B., Eaby-Sandy, B., Murphy, B. A., & MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group (2011) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1197-6 · Cited by 444
The Role of VEGF and EGFR Inhibition: Implications for Combining Anti–VEGF and Anti–EGFR Agents
Tabernero, J. (2007) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-06-0404 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, H. Q., Rosenberg, A., LoBuglio, A., Schmidt, W., Wolff, R. A., Deutsch, J., Needle, M., & Abbruzzese, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2610-2616
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2054870962
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cetuximab, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, in Combination With Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.12.040
- The paper
- Xiong, H. Q., Rosenberg, A., LoBuglio, A., Schmidt, W., Wolff, R. A., Deutsch, J., Needle, M., & Abbruzzese, J. L. (2004). Cetuximab, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, in Combination With Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.12.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.