The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence Proportions of Brain Metastases in Patients Diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System
Abstract
Purpose: Population-based estimates of the incidence of brain metastases are not generally available. The purpose of this study was to calculate population-based incidence proportions (IPs) of brain metastases from single primary lung, melanoma, breast, renal, or colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with single primary lung, melanoma, breast, renal, or colorectal cancer (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS) were used for analysis. IP of brain metastases by primary site and variable of interest (race, sex, age at diagnosis of primary cancer, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] stage of primary cancer) was calculated with 95% CIs. Results: Total IP percentage (IP%) of brain metastases was 9.6% for all primary sites combined, and highest for lung (19.9%), followed by melanoma (6.9%), renal (6.5%), breast (5.1%), and colorectal (1.8%) cancers. Racial differences were seen with African Americans demonstrating higher IP% of brain metastases compared with other racial groups for most primary sites. IP% was significantly higher for female patients with lung cancer, and significantly higher for male patients with melanoma. The highest IP% of brain metastases occurred at different ages at diagnoses: age 40 to 49 years for primary lung cancer; age 50 to 59 years for primary melanoma, renal, or colorectal cancers; and age 20 to 39 for primary breast cancer. IP% significantly increased as SEER stage of primary cancer advanced for all primary sites. Conclusion: Total IP% of brain metastases was lower than previously reported, and it varied by primary site, race, sex, age at diagnosis of primary cancer, and SEER stage of primary cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biology of brain metastases—translation to new therapies
Eichler, A. F., Chung, E., Kodack, D. P., Loeffler, J. S., Fukumura, D., & Jain, R. K. (2011) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.58 · Cited by 567
Welsh, J. W., Komaki, R., Amini, A., Munsell, M. F., Unger, W., Allen, P. K., Chang, J. Y., Wefel, J. S., McGovern, S. L., Garland, L. L., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.1174 · Cited by 395
Brain metastases: epidemiology
(2018) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811161-1.00002-5 · Cited by 336
Metastatic breast cancer: the potential of miRNA for diagnosis and treatment monitoring
McGuire, A., Brown, J. A. L., & Kerin, M. J. (2015) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-015-9551-7 · Cited by 329
Colorectal cancer: Metastases to a single organ
Vatandoust, S. (2015) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11767 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Sloan, A. E., Davis, F. G., Vigneau, F. D., Lai, P., & Sawaya, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-07-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2865-2872
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2155073814
- Cited by
- 1,843
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence Proportions of Brain Metastases in Patients Diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.12.149
- The paper
- Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Sloan, A. E., Davis, F. G., Vigneau, F. D., Lai, P., & Sawaya, R. E. (2004). Incidence Proportions of Brain Metastases in Patients Diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.12.149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.