The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Childhood Cancer Survival Trends in Europe: A EUROCARE Working Group Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: EUROCARE collected data from population-based cancer registries in 20 European countries. We used this data to compare childhood cancer survival time trends in Europe. Patients and Methods: Survival in 44,129 children diagnosed under the age of 15 years during 1983 to 1994 was analyzed. Sex- and age-adjusted 5-year survival trends for 10 common cancers and for all cancers combined were estimated for five regions (West Germany, the United Kingdom, Eastern Europe, Nordic countries, and West and South Europe) and Europe as a whole. Europe-wide trends for 14 rare cancers were estimated. Results: For all cancers combined, 5-year survival increased from 65% for diagnoses in 1983 to 1985 to 75% in 1992 to 1994. Survival improved for all individual cancers except melanoma, osteosarcoma, and thyroid carcinoma; although for retinoblastoma, chondrosarcoma, and fibrosarcoma, improvements were not significant. The most marked improvements (50% to 66%) occurred in Eastern Europe. For common cancers, the greatest improvements were for leukemia and lymphomas, with risk of dying reducing significantly by 5% to 6% per year. Survival for CNS tumors improved significantly from 57% to 65%, with risk reducing by 3% per year. Risk reduced by 4% per year for neuroblastoma and 3% per year for Wilms’ tumor and rhabdomyosarcoma. The survival gap between regions reduced over the period, particularly for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, CNS tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. For rare Burkitt’s lymphoma, hepatoblastoma, gonadal germ cell tumors, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, risk reductions were at least 10% per year. Conclusion: These gratifying improvements in survival can often be plausibly related to advances in treatment. The prevalence of European adults with a history of childhood cancer will inevitably increase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mirabello, L., Troisi, R. J., & Savage, S. A. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24121 · Cited by 2,199
Mirabello, L., Troisi, R. J., & Savage, S. A. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24320 · Cited by 791
Kivela, T. (2009) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.150292 · Cited by 721
Chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment for osteosarcoma: Where do we stand?
Anninga, J. K., Gelderblom, H., Fiocco, M., Kroep, J. R., Taminiau, A. H. M., Hogendoorn, P. C. W., & Egeler, R. M. (2011) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.05.030 · Cited by 456
Abrahão, R., Lichtensztajn, D. Y., Ribeiro, R. C., Marina, N. M., Keogh, R. H., Marcos-Gragera, R., Glaser, S. L., & Keegan, T. H. M. (2015) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.25544 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Gatta, G., Capocaccia, R., Stiller, C., Kaatsch, P., Berrino, F., Terenziani, M., & the EUROCARE Working Group
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3742-3751
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2129354608
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Childhood Cancer Survival Trends in Europe: A EUROCARE Working Group Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.00.554
- The paper
- Gatta, G., Capocaccia, R., Stiller, C., Kaatsch, P., Berrino, F., Terenziani, M., & the EUROCARE Working Group. (2005). Childhood Cancer Survival Trends in Europe: A EUROCARE Working Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.00.554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.