Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Open access
Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K., Schwartz, Lawrence, Ricci, Sergio, Amadori, Dino, Santoro, Armando, Figer, Arie, De Greve, Jacques, Douillard, Jean-Yves, Lathia, Chetan, Schwartz, Brian, Taylor, Ian, Moscovici, Marius, Saltz, Leonard B.·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: This phase II study of sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf kinase and receptor tyrosine kinases, assessed efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: Patients with inoperable HCC, no prior systemic treatment, and Child–Pugh (CP) A or B, received continuous, oral sorafenib 400 mg bid in 4-week cycles. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using modified WHO criteria. Sorafenib pharmacokinetics were measured in plasma samples. Biomarker analysis included phosphorylated extracellular signal regulated kinase (pERK) in pretreatment biopsies (immunohistochemistry) and blood-cell RNA expression patterns in selected patients. Results: Of 137 patients treated (male, 71%; median age, 69 years), 72% had CP A, and 28% had CP B. On the basis of independent assessment, three (2.2%) patients achieved a partial response, eight (5.8%) had a minor response, and 46 (33.6%) had stable disease for at least 16 weeks. Investigator-assessed median time to progression (TTP) was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 9.2 months. Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities included fatigue (9.5%), diarrhea (8.0%), and hand–foot skin reaction (5.1%). There were no significant pharmacokinetic differences between CP A and B patients. Pretreatment tumor pERK levels correlated with TTP. A panel of 18 expressed genes was identified that distinguished “nonprogressors” from “progressors” with an estimated 100% accuracy. Conclusion: Although single-agent sorafenib has modest efficacy in HCC, the manageable toxicity and mechanisms of action support a role for combination regimens with other anticancer agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.01.3441

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,195

Metadata

Authors
Abou-Alfa, G. K., Schwartz, L., Ricci, S., Amadori, D., Santoro, A., Figer, A., De Greve, J., Douillard, J.-Y., Lathia, C., Schwartz, B., Taylor, I., Moscovici, M., & Saltz, L. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-09-10
Volume
24
Issue
26
Pages
4293-4300
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2156871508
Cited by
1,195
References
1
FWCI
64.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.01.3441
The paper
Abou-Alfa, G. K., Schwartz, L., Ricci, S., Amadori, D., Santoro, A., Figer, A., De Greve, J., Douillard, J.-Y., Lathia, C., Schwartz, B., Taylor, I., Moscovici, M., & Saltz, L. B. (2006). Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.3441

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.