The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetics of Response to Long-Term Treatment Combining Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol in Patients With Superficial Radiation-Induced Fibrosis
Abstract
Purpose: Significant regression of radiation (RT) -induced fibrosis (RIF) has been achieved after treatment combining pentoxifylline (PTX) and alpha-tocopherol (vitE). In this study, we focus on the maximum response, how long it takes to achieve response, and changes after treatment discontinuation. Patients and Methods: Measurable superficial RIF was assessed in patients treated by RT for breast cancer in a long-treatment (24 to 48 months) PTX-vitE (LPE) group of 37 patients (47 RIFs) and in a short-treatment (6 to 12 months) PTX-vitE (SPE) group of seven patients (eight RIFs). Between April 1995 and April 2000, women were treated with a daily combination of PTX (800 mg) and VitE (1,000 IU). Results: Combined PTX-vitE was continuously effective and resulted in exponential RIF surface area regression (−46% for LPE and −68% for SPE at 6 months, −58% for LPE and −69% for SPE at 12 months, −63% for LPE and −62% for SPE at 18 months, and −68% for LPE at 24 and 36 months). The mean estimated maximal treatment effect was 68% RIF surface area regression. The mean time to this effect was 24 months and was shorter (16 months) in more recent RIF (< 6 years since RT) than in older RIF (28 months; P = .0003). Symptom severity (Subjective Objective Medical Management and Analytic Evaluation score) was halved in both groups. After treatment discontinuation, mean RIF surface area at 1 year had increased by +40% in the SPE group (rebound) and +8.5% in the LPE group. Conclusion: Under combined PTX-vitE treatment, RIF regression was exponential, with a two-thirds maximum response after a mean of 2 years. There was a risk of a rebound effect if treatment was too short. Long treatment (≥ 3 years) is recommended in patients with severe RIF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase All-Cause Mortality
Miller, E. R., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Dalal, D., Riemersma, R. A., Appel, L. J., & Guallar, E. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00110 · Cited by 2,577
Vivekananthan, D. P., Penn, M. S., Sapp, S. K., Hsu, A., & Topol, E. J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13637-9 · Cited by 1,083
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/b98882 · Cited by 930
Cited by
Ionizing Radiation: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Ryan, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2011.411 · Cited by 502
Fibrosis and cancer: Do myofibroblasts come also from epithelial cells via EMT?
Radisky, D. C., Kenny, P. A., & Bissell, M. J. (2007) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.21186 · Cited by 344
Liu, Y.-Q., Wang, X.-L., He, D.-H., & Cheng, Y.-X. (2021) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153402 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Delanian, S., Porcher, R., Rudant, J., & Lefaix, J.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 8570-8579
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2110365702
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics of Response to Long-Term Treatment Combining Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol in Patients With Superficial Radiation-Induced Fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.02.4729
- The paper
- Delanian, S., Porcher, R., Rudant, J., & Lefaix, J.-L. (2005). Kinetics of Response to Long-Term Treatment Combining Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol in Patients With Superficial Radiation-Induced Fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.4729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.