The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Symptom Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Purpose: A variety of assessment instruments have been created to identify cancer symptoms. We reviewed systematically cancer symptom assessment instruments published in English. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE database, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE was performed. Non–peer-reviewed articles were identified through BIOSIS. Articles were accessed through the related article links in PubMed and references were searched by hand. Studies were included if the instrument had symptom assessment as the primary outcome. Quality-of-life instruments were excluded. Results: We identified 21 instruments; some had undergone modification or validation. An additional 28 studies examined symptom prevalence and interrelations; many involved symptom checklists. Studies varied in design, patient characteristics, symptoms, and outcome. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity in design, study outcomes, and validation. Seventy-six articles and two conference abstracts (derived from MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, BIOSIS, related articles link in PubMed, and search by hand) met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The electronic search (without related links) yielded only 26% of those articles and conference abstracts that met inclusion criteria. Searches by hand of related articles identified 59% of studies. Conclusion: Twenty-one instruments were identified as appropriate for clinical use. The instruments vary in symptom content and extent of psychometric validation. Both comprehensive and shorter instruments have been developed, and some instruments are intended for specific symptom assessment or symptoms related to treatment. There is no ideal instrument, and the wide variety of instruments reflects the different settings for symptom assessment. Additional research is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2401_06 · Cited by 1,751
Screening for Adjustment Disorders and Major Depressive Disorders in Cancer In-Patients
Razavi, D., Delvaux, N., Farvacques, C., & Robaye, E. (1990) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.156.1.79 · Cited by 514
Prevalence of symptoms among patients with advanced cancer: An international collaborative study
Vainio, A., & Auvinen, A. (1996) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(96)00042-5 · Cited by 455
Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatment
Ibbotson, T., Maguire, P., Selby, P., Priestman, T., & Wallace, L. (1994) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80015-2 · Cited by 421
Given, C. W., Stommel, M., Given, B., Osuch, J., Kurtz, M. E., & Kurtz, J. C. (1993) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.4.277 · Cited by 325
A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation
Baker, F., Denniston, M., Zabora, J., Polland, A., & Dudley, W. N. (2002) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.564 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Basch, E., Iasonos, A., McDonough, T., Barz, A., Culkin, A., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., & Schrag, D. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70910-x · Cited by 653
Symptom Burden: Multiple Symptoms and Their Impact as Patient-Reported Outcomes
Cleeland, C. S. (2007) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm005 · Cited by 455
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Riphagen, I., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9 · Cited by 186
Howell, D., Keller–Olaman, S., Oliver, T. K., Hack, T. F., Broadfield, L., Biggs, K., Chung, J., Gravelle, D., Green, E., Hamel, M., et al. (2013) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3747/co.20.1302 · Cited by 158
Delgado‐Guay, M. O., Parsons, H. A., Li, Z., Palmer, L. J., & Bruera, E. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24017 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkova, J., Davis, M. P., Walsh, D., Tiernan, E., O'Leary, N., LeGrand, S. B., Lagman, R. L., & Russell, K. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-03-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1459-1473
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2068132070
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Symptom Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.02.8332
- The paper
- Kirkova, J., Davis, M. P., Walsh, D., Tiernan, E., O'Leary, N., LeGrand, S. B., Lagman, R. L., & Russell, K. M. (2006). Cancer Symptom Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.8332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
