Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation Compared With Conventional Treatment in Myeloma Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Control Trial From the Group Myelome-Autogreffe

Open access
Fermand, Jean-Paul, Katsahian, Sandrine, Divine, Marine, Leblond, Veronique, Dreyfus, Francois, Macro, Margaret, Arnulf, Bertrand, Royer, Bruno, Mariette, Xavier, Pertuiset, Edouard, Belanger, Coralie, Janvier, Maud, Chevret, Sylvie, Brouet, Jean Claude, Ravaud, Philippe·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To study the impact of high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell support in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) between the ages of 55 and 65 years. Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety patients between 55 and 65 years old who had newly diagnosed stage II or III MM were randomly assigned to receive either conventional chemotherapy (CCT; ie, monthly courses of a regimen of vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone) or HDT and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (using either melphalan alone 200 mg/m 2 intravenous [IV] or melphalan 140 mg/m 2 IV plus busulfan 16 mg/kg orally as pretransplantation cytoreduction). Results: Within a median follow-up of 120 months, median event-free survival (EFS) times were 25 and 19 months in the HDT and CCT groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) time was 47.8 months in the HDT group compared with 47.6 months in the CCT group. A trend to better EFS (P = .07) was observed in favor of HDT, whereas OS curves were not statistically different (P = .91). The period of time without symptoms, treatment, and treatment toxicity (TwiSTT) was significantly longer for the HDT patients than for the CCT patients (P = .03). Conclusion: With a median follow-up time of approximately 10 years, this randomized trial confirmed a benefit of HDT in terms of EFS and TwiSTT but did not provide evidence for superiority of HDT over CCT in OS of patients aged 55 to 65 years with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.03.0551

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Fermand, J.-P., Katsahian, S., Divine, M., Leblond, V., Dreyfus, F., Macro, M., Arnulf, B., Royer, B., Mariette, X., Pertuiset, E., Belanger, C., Janvier, M., Chevret, S., Brouet, J. C., & Ravaud, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-12-20
Volume
23
Issue
36
Pages
9227-9233
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2107057207
Cited by
399
References
2
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation Compared With Conventional Treatment in Myeloma Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Control Trial From the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.03.0551
The paper
Fermand, J.-P., Katsahian, S., Divine, M., Leblond, V., Dreyfus, F., Macro, M., Arnulf, B., Royer, B., Mariette, X., Pertuiset, E., Belanger, C., Janvier, M., Chevret, S., Brouet, J. C., & Ravaud, P. (2005). High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation Compared With Conventional Treatment in Myeloma Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Control Trial From the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.0551

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.