Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Testing in Pheochromocytoma or Functional Paraganglioma

Open access
Amar, Laurence, Bertherat, Jérôme, Baudin, Eric, Ajzenberg, Christiane, Bressac-de Paillerets, Brigitte, Chabre, Olivier, Chamontin, Bernard, Delemer, Brigitte, Giraud, Sophie, Murat, Arnaud, Niccoli-Sire, Patricia, Richard, Stéphane, Rohmer, Vincent, Sadoul, Jean-Louis, Strompf, Laurence, Schlumberger, Martin, Bertagna, Xavier, Plouin, Pierre-François, Jeunemaitre, Xavier, Gimenez-Roqueplo, Anne-Paule·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the yield and the clinical value of systematic screening of susceptibility genes for patients with pheochromocytoma (pheo) or functional paraganglioma (pgl). Patients and Methods: We studied 314 patients with a pheo or a functional pgl, including 56 patients having a family history and/or a syndromic presentation and 258 patients having an apparently sporadic presentation. Clinical data and blood samples were collected, and all five major pheo-pgl susceptibility genes (RET, VHL, SDHB, SDHD, and SDHC) were screened. Neurofibromatosis type 1 was diagnosed from phenotypic criteria. Results: We have identified 86 patients (27.4%) with a hereditary tumor. Among the 56 patients with a family/syndromic presentation, 13 have had neurofibromatosis type 1, and germline mutations on the VHL, RET, SDHD, and SDHB genes were present in 16, 15, nine, and three patients, respectively. Among the 258 patients with an apparently sporadic presentation, 30 (11.6%) had a germline mutation (18 patients on SDHB, nine patients on VHL, two patients on SDHD, and one patient on RET). Mutation carriers were younger and more frequently had bilateral or extra-adrenal tumors. In patients with an SDHB mutation, the tumors were larger, more frequently extra-adrenal, and malignant. Conclusion: Genetic testing oriented by family/sporadic presentation should be proposed to all patients with pheo or functional pgl. We suggest an algorithm that would allow the confirmation of suspected inherited disease as well as the diagnosis of unexpected inherited disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.03.1484

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Amar, L., Bertherat, J., Baudin, E., Ajzenberg, C., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Chabre, O., Chamontin, B., Delemer, B., Giraud, S., Murat, A., Niccoli-Sire, P., Richard, S., Rohmer, V., Sadoul, J.-L., Strompf, L., Schlumberger, M., Bertagna, X., Plouin, P.-F., Jeunemaitre, X., & Gimenez-Roqueplo, A.-P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
34
Pages
8812-8818
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2103306705
Cited by
684
References
2
FWCI
28.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Testing in Pheochromocytoma or Functional Paraganglioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.03.1484
The paper
Amar, L., Bertherat, J., Baudin, E., Ajzenberg, C., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Chabre, O., Chamontin, B., Delemer, B., Giraud, S., Murat, A., Niccoli-Sire, P., Richard, S., Rohmer, V., Sadoul, J.-L., Strompf, L., Schlumberger, M., Bertagna, X., Plouin, P.-F., Jeunemaitre, X., & Gimenez-Roqueplo, A.-P. (2005). Genetic Testing in Pheochromocytoma or Functional Paraganglioma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.1484

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.