Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Validation of a Gene Expression–Based Prognostic Signature in Lymph Node–Negative Primary Breast Cancer

Foekens, John A., Atkins, David, Zhang, Yi, Sweep, Fred C.G.J., Harbeck, Nadia, Paradiso, Angelo, Cufer, Tanja, Sieuwerts, Anieta M., Talantov, Dmitri, Span, Paul N., Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C.G., Zito, Alfredo F., Specht, Katja, Hoefler, Heinz, Golouh, Rastko, Schittulli, Francesco, Schmitt, Manfred, Beex, Louk V.A.M., Klijn, Jan G.M., Wang, Yixin·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: We previously identified in a single-center study a 76-gene prognostic signature for lymph node-negative (LNN) breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to validate this gene signature in an independent more diverse population of LNN patients from multiple institutions. Patients and Methods: Using custom-designed DNA chips we analyzed the expression of the 76 genes in RNA of frozen tumor samples from 180 LNN patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment. Results: In this independent validation, the 76-gene signature was highly informative in identifying patients with distant metastasis within 5 years (hazard ratio, [HR], 7.41; 95% CI, 2.63 to 20.9), even when corrected for traditional prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (HR, 11.36; 95% CI, 2.67 to 48.4). The actuarial 5- and 10-year distant metastasis-free survival were 96% (95% CI, 89% to 99%) and 94% (95% CI, 83% to 98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 74% (95% CI, 64% to 81%) and 65% (53% to 74%), respectively for the poor profile group. The sensitivity for 5-yr distant metastasis-free survival was 90%, and the specificity was 50%. The positive and negative predictive values were 38% (95% CI, 29% to 47%) and 94% (95% CI, 86% to 97%), respectively. The 76-gene signature was confirmed as a strong prognostic factor in subgroups of estrogen receptor-positive patients, pre- and postmenopausal patients, and patients with tumor sizes 20 mm or smaller. The subgroup of patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors was considered too small to perform a separate analysis. Conclusion: Our data provide a strong methodologic and clinical multicenter validation of the predefined prognostic 76-gene signature in LNN breast cancer patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.03.9115

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Foekens, J. A., Atkins, D., Zhang, Y., Sweep, F. C. G. J., Harbeck, N., Paradiso, A., Cufer, T., Sieuwerts, A. M., Talantov, D., Span, P. N., Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G., Zito, A. F., Specht, K., Hoefler, H., Golouh, R., Schittulli, F., Schmitt, M., Beex, L. V. A. M., Klijn, J. G. M., & Wang, Y.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-04-20
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1665-1671
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2139306864
Cited by
361
References
1
FWCI
21.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Validation of a Gene Expression–Based Prognostic Signature in Lymph Node–Negative Primary Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.03.9115
The paper
Foekens, J. A., Atkins, D., Zhang, Y., Sweep, F. C. G. J., Harbeck, N., Paradiso, A., Cufer, T., Sieuwerts, A. M., Talantov, D., Span, P. N., Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G., Zito, A. F., Specht, K., Hoefler, H., Golouh, R., Schittulli, F., Schmitt, M., Beex, L. V. A. M., Klijn, J. G. M., & Wang, Y. (2006). Multicenter Validation of a Gene Expression–Based Prognostic Signature in Lymph Node–Negative Primary Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.9115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.