Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Nitroglycerin Plus Vinorelbine and Cisplatin With Vinorelbine and Cisplatin Alone in Previously Untreated Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Yasuda, Hiroyasu, Yamaya, Mutsuo, Nakayama, Katsutoshi, Sasaki, Takahiko, Ebihara, Satoru, Kanda, Akio, Asada, Masanori, Inoue, Daisuke, Suzuki, Tomoko, Okazaki, Tatsuma, Takahashi, Hidenori, Yoshida, Motoki, Kaneta, Tomohiro, Ishizawa, Kota, Yamanda, Shinsuke, Tomita, Naoki, Yamasaki, Miyako, Kikuchi, Akiko, Kubo, Hiroshi, Sasaki, Hidetada·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nitroglycerin plus vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as the experimental arm for the next phase III trial. Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1, with transdermally applied nitroglycerin (25 mg/patient daily for 5 days; arm A) or with placebo patch (arm B) every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles in a double-blind and controlled trial. Primary efficacy end points were the best confirmed response rate and time to disease progression (TTP). Results: The response rate in arm A (72%; 43 of 60 patients) was significantly higher than that for patients in arm B (42%; 25 of 60 patients; P < .001). Median TTP in arm A was longer than that in arm B (327 v 185 days). No severe adverse effect was recognized for either arm. The rate of grade 1 to 2 headache in arm A (30%; 18 of 60 patients) was significantly higher than that in arm B (2%; one of 60 patients; P < .001, χ 2 test). Conclusion: Use of nitroglycerin combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin may improve overall response and TTP in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The arm A regimen is being evaluated in a large phase III trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.04.0436

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Yasuda, H., Yamaya, M., Nakayama, K., Sasaki, T., Ebihara, S., Kanda, A., Asada, M., Inoue, D., Suzuki, T., Okazaki, T., Takahashi, H., Yoshida, M., Kaneta, T., Ishizawa, K., Yamanda, S., Tomita, N., Yamasaki, M., Kikuchi, A., Kubo, H., & Sasaki, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
688-694
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2153940455
Cited by
170
References
7
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Nitroglycerin Plus Vinorelbine and Cisplatin With Vinorelbine and Cisplatin Alone in Previously Untreated Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.04.0436
The paper
Yasuda, H., Yamaya, M., Nakayama, K., Sasaki, T., Ebihara, S., Kanda, A., Asada, M., Inoue, D., Suzuki, T., Okazaki, T., Takahashi, H., Yoshida, M., Kaneta, T., Ishizawa, K., Yamanda, S., Tomita, N., Yamasaki, M., Kikuchi, A., Kubo, H., & Sasaki, H. (2006). Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Nitroglycerin Plus Vinorelbine and Cisplatin With Vinorelbine and Cisplatin Alone in Previously Untreated Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.0436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.