The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to Enhance Physical and Psychological Functioning Among Younger Women Who Are Ending Nonhormonal Adjuvant Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To conduct a clinical trial to determine if an educational intervention and a nutritional intervention could enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women completing treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Younger women (50 years of age or younger, N = 252), within 2 months of having completed active nonhormonal adjuvant therapy, diagnosed with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer with 10 or fewer positive lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a three-arm clinical trial. Women in the control arm of the trial received standard medical care. Women in the two active arms received either an educational intervention, designed to provide information about their illness and enhance adjustment, or a nutritional intervention, designed to promote a more healthy diet. Primary end points included mental functioning, physical functioning, and depressive symptoms. Women were assessed before random assignment, 4 months later (immediately postintervention), and 13 months later (9 months postintervention). Results: Participants assigned to the two active treatment arms had significantly less depressive symptomatology and better physical functioning by 13-month follow-up (differences between the two active arms were nonsignificant). These effects were primarily accounted for by changes in intrusive thoughts, concerns regarding cancer recurrence and mortality, self-concept perceptions, and self-efficacy expectations. Conclusion: Tailored psychosocial interventions can be effectively designed to enhance adjustment among younger women who are completing nonhormonal adjuvant therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Yet except for a single study targeting distressed re-entry phase cancer survivors [38], the interventions developed for re-entry phase cancer survivors [39–48] target general cancer survivors rather than the anxious or distressed survivors most in need of help.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Self-citationImpact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Spiegel, D., Kraemer, H., Bloom, J., & Gottheil, E. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91551-1 · Cited by 2,353
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M. R., Bayliss, M. S., McHorney, C. A., Rogers, W. H., & Raczek, A. E. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 1,734
The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Goodwin, P. J., Leszcz, M., Ennis, M., Koopmans, J., Vincent, L., Guther, H., Drysdale, E., Hundleby, M., Chochinov, H. M., Navarro, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011871 · Cited by 891
Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients
Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00004-5 · Cited by 822
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baider LA, Kaplan De-Nour A: Breast cancer—A family affair, in Cooper CL (ed): Stress and Breast Cancer . New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons Inc, pp 155,1988-170
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199803/04)7:2<69::AID-PON286>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faller, H., Schuler, M., Richard, M., Heckl, U., Weis, J., & Küffner, R. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922 · Cited by 912
Howard-Anderson, J., Ganz, P. A., Bower, J. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2012) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr541 · Cited by 830
Mishra, S. I., Scherer, R. W., Snyder, C. F., Geigle, P. M., Berlanstein, D. R., & Topaloglu, Ö. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008465.pub2 · Cited by 729
Health Psychology: Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease
Stanton, A. L., Revenson, T. A., & Tennen, H. A. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085615 · Cited by 747
Zeltzer, L. K., Recklitis, C., Buchbinder, D., Zebrack, B., Casillas, J., Tsao, J. C. I., Lu, Q., & Krull, K. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.21.1433 · Cited by 660
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheier, M. F., Helgeson, V. S., Schulz, R., Colvin, S., Berga, S., Bridges, M. W., Knapp, J., Gerszten, K., & Pappert, W. S.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scheier, Michael F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4298-4311
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2172250309
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-02-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- University of Pittsburgh
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL65111, HL65112, P50HL065112, P50HL065111)
- National Cancer Institute (CA103730, P20CA103730, CA64711, R01CA064711)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- early breast cancer, young women, psychosocial interventions, educational intervention, dietary intervention, depressive symptoms, physical function, psychological functioning, intrusive thoughts, self-efficacy, self-concept, adjustment to cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Patient Education as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Nutritional Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
