The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Index for Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse
Abstract
Purpose: The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse is associated with unsatisfactory rates of complete responses that usually are short lived. Therefore, a clinically useful prognostic index can facilitate therapeutic decision making and evaluation of investigational treatment strategies at relapse of AML. Patients and Methods: A prognostic score is presented based on the multivariate analysis of 667 AML patients in first relapse among 1,540 newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients (age 15 to 60 years) entered onto three successive Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Collaborative Group trials. Results: Four clinically relevant parameters are included in this index (ie, length of relapse-free interval after first complete remission, cytogenetics at diagnosis, age at relapse, and whether previous stem-cell transplantation was performed). Using this stratification system, three risk groups were defined: a favorable prognostic group A (overall survival [OS] of 70% at 1 year and 46% at 5 years), an intermediate-risk group B (OS of 49% at 1 year and 18% at 5 years), and a poor-risk group C (OS of 16% at 1 year and 4% at 5 years). Conclusion: The prognostic index estimates the outcome of AML patients in first relapse using four commonly applied clinical parameters and might identify patients who are candidates for salvage and investigational therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission
Wei, A. H., Döhner, H., Pocock, C., Montesinos, P., Afanasyev, B., Dombret, H., Ravandi, F., Sayar, H., Jang, J.-H., Porkka, K., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2004444 · Cited by 445
Self-citationCoexpression profile of leukemic stem cell markers for combinatorial targeted therapy in AML
Haubner, S., Perna, F., Köhnke, T., Schmidt, C., Berman, S., Augsberger, C., Schnorfeil, F. M., Krupka, C., Lichtenegger, F. S., Liu, X., et al. (2019) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0180-3 · Cited by 336
Anguille, S., Van de Velde, A. L., Smits, E. L., Van Tendeloo, V. F., Juliusson, G., Cools, N., Nijs, G., Stein, B., Lion, E., Van Driessche, A., et al. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-04-780155 · Cited by 230
Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review
Mallett, S., Royston, P., Dutton, S., Waters, R., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-20 · Cited by 206
“Patients recruited from RCTs in 11% (5) of the studies [14,38,40,44,47].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review.
Mallett, S., Royston, P., Waters, R., Dutton, S., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-21 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Breems, D. A., Van Putten, W. L. J., Huijgens, P. C., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Verhoef, G. E. G., Verdonck, L. F., Vellenga, E., De Greef, G. E., Jacky, E., Van der Lelie, J., Boogaerts, M. A., & Löwenberg, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-03-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1969-1978
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2097192169
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Index for Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.06.027
- The paper
- Breems, D. A., Van Putten, W. L. J., Huijgens, P. C., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Verhoef, G. E. G., Verdonck, L. F., Vellenga, E., De Greef, G. E., Jacky, E., Van der Lelie, J., Boogaerts, M. A., & Löwenberg, B. (2005). Prognostic Index for Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.06.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.