The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic Factors in Advanced Cancer Patients: Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations—A Study by the Steering Committee of the European Association for Palliative Care
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To offer evidence-based clinical recommendations concerning prognosis in advanced cancer patients. Methods: A Working Group of the Research Network of the European Association for Palliative Care identified clinically significant topics, reviewed the studies, and assigned the level of evidence. A formal meta-analysis was not feasible because of the heterogeneity of published studies and the lack of minimal standards in reporting results. A systematic electronic literature search within the main available medical literature databases was performed for each of the following four areas identified: clinical prediction of survival (CPS), biologic factors, clinical signs and symptoms and psychosocial variables, and prognostic scores. Only studies on patients with advanced cancer and survival ≤ 90 days were included. Results: A total of 38 studies were evaluated. Level A evidence-based recommendations of prognostic correlation could be formulated for CPS (albeit with a series of limitations of which clinicians must be aware) and prognostic scores. Recommendations on the use of other prognostic factors, such as performance status, symptoms associated with cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (weight loss, anorexia, dysphagia, and xerostomia), dyspnea, delirium, and some biologic factors (leukocytosis, lymphocytopenia, and C-reactive protein), reached level B. Conclusion: Prognostication of life expectancy is a significant clinical commitment for clinicians involved in oncology and palliative care. More accurate prognostication is feasible and can be achieved by combining clinical experience and evidence from the literature. Using and communicating prognostic information should be part of a multidisciplinary palliative care approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patient and Caregiver Characteristics and Nursing Home Placement in Patients With Dementia
Yaffe, K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2090 · Cited by 903
Stuck, A. E., Egger, M., Hammer, A., Minder, C. E., & Beck, J. C. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.8.1022 · Cited by 675
Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Altman, D. G., & Lyman, G. H. (1998) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1023/a:1006193704132 · Cited by 271
Schulz, R., Beach, S. R., Lind, B., Martire, L. M., Zdaniuk, B., Hirsch, C., Jackson, S., & Burton, L. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.24.3123 · Cited by 261
Caring for Bereaved Patients: "All the Doctors Just Suddenly Go"
Prigerson, H. G., & Jacobs, S. C. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.11.1369 · Cited by 200
Cited by
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients
Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 · Cited by 3,114
Self-citationBaracos, V. E., Martin, L., Korc, M., Guttridge, D. C., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 · Cited by 1,738
Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews
Hayden, J. A., Côté, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010 · Cited by 1,452
Kiely, B. E., Martin, A. J., Tattersall, M. H. N., Nowak, A. K., Goldstein, D., Wilcken, N. R. C., Wyld, D. K., Abdi, E. A., Glasgow, A., Beale, P. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.7821 · Cited by 62
Self-citationJamieson, N. B., Mohamed, M., Oien, K. A., Foulis, A. K., Dickson, E. J., Imrie, C. W., Carter, C. R., McKay, C. J., & McMillan, D. C. (2012) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2370-y · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Maltoni, M., Caraceni, A., Brunelli, C., Broeckaert, B., Christakis, N., Eychmueller, S., Glare, P., Nabal, M., Viganò, A., Larkin, P., De Conno, F., Hanks, G., & Kaasa, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 6240-6248
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2116976533
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 28.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors in Advanced Cancer Patients: Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations—A Study by the Steering Committee of the European Association for Palliative Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.06.866
- The paper
- Maltoni, M., Caraceni, A., Brunelli, C., Broeckaert, B., Christakis, N., Eychmueller, S., Glare, P., Nabal, M., Viganò, A., Larkin, P., De Conno, F., Hanks, G., & Kaasa, S. (2005). Prognostic Factors in Advanced Cancer Patients: Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations—A Study by the Steering Committee of the European Association for Palliative Care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.06.866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.