The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT Trialists
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To investigate the relationships between biomarker changes in breast cancer during neoadjuvant (preoperative) endocrine therapy. Patients and Methods: The IMPACT trial compared the preoperative use of tamoxifen with anastrozole alone or in combination in postmenopausal women (n = 330) with primary breast cancer. Biomarkers were measured in tumor biopsy specimens taken at baseline, and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment. Results: A decrease in the proliferation marker Ki67 occurred in the majority of patients: 52 (93%) of 56, 46 (85%) of 54, and 37 (84%) of 44 patients in the anastrozole, tamoxifen, and combination groups, respectively. There was a significantly greater suppression of Ki67 in the anastrozole-treated group than in the tamoxifen- or combination-treated groups, which is parallel to the greater efficacy seen for anastrozole over these two treatments in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination adjuvant trial. A positive relationship was noted between estrogen-receptor level and Ki67 suppression in all patients. Ki67 was reduced to a greater extent in progesterone receptor-positive tumors compared with progesterone receptor-negative tumors. HER-2-negative tumors tended to show a greater reduction in Ki67 compared with HER-2-positive tumors, but the difference was only significant in the tamoxifen group after 2 weeks, and in the anastrozole group after 12 weeks. Conclusion: These results confirm the value of Ki67 as a molecular marker, and provide information regarding the relationships between treatment-induced changes in Ki67 and other important biomarkers. Studies such as this should help integrate agents targeted at growth factor signaling with endocrine agents in breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations
Engelman, J. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2664 · Cited by 2,445
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer: targets, trials and biomarkers
Paplomata, E., & O’Regan, R. (2014) · Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology · doi:10.1177/1758834014530023 · Cited by 593
Arpino, G., Wiechmann, L., Osborne, C. K., & Schiff, R. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0045 · Cited by 549
Duffy, M. J., Harbeck, N., Nap, M., Molina, R., Nicolini, A., Senkus, E., & Cardoso, F. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.017 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowsett, M., Ebbs, S. R., Dixon, J. M., Skene, A., Griffith, C., Boeddinghaus, I., Salter, J., Detre, S., Hills, M., Ashley, S., Francis, S., Walsh, G., & Smith, I. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-04-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2477-2492
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2111253826
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT Trialists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.07.559
- The paper
- Dowsett, M., Ebbs, S. R., Dixon, J. M., Skene, A., Griffith, C., Boeddinghaus, I., Salter, J., Detre, S., Hills, M., Ashley, S., Francis, S., Walsh, G., & Smith, I. E. (2005). Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT Trialists. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.07.559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.