Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,135

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating Tumor Cells: A Novel Prognostic Factor for Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer

Open access
Cristofanilli, Massimo, Hayes, Daniel F., Budd, G. Thomas, Ellis, Mathew J., Stopeck, Alison, Reuben, James M., Doyle, Gerald V., Matera, Jeri, Allard, W. Jeffrey, Miller, M. Craig, Fritsche, Herbert A., Hortobagyi, Gabriel N., Terstappen, Leon W.M.M.·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is incurable; its treatment is palliative. We investigated whether the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicts treatment efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed MBC who were about to start first-line therapy. Patients and Methods: One hundred seventy-seven patients with measurable MBC were enrolled onto a prospective study. Eighty-three of the 177 patients were entering first-line treatment, and these patients are the focus of this analysis. CTCs from 7.5 mL of whole blood drawn before treatment initiation (baseline) and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months were isolated and enumerated using immunomagnetics. Results: The mean (± standard deviation) follow-up time was 11.1 ± 4.4 months (median, 12.2 months). Forty-three patients (52%) had ≥ five CTCs at baseline. The median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.4 months), and the median OS was more than 18 months. Patients with ≥ five CTCs at baseline and at first follow-up (4 weeks) had a worse prognosis than patients with less than five CTCs (baseline: median PFS, 4.9 v 9.5 months, respectively; log-rank, P = .0014; median OS, 14.2 v > 18 months, respectively; log-rank, P = .0048; first follow-up: median PFS, 2.1 v 8.9 months, respectively; log-rank, P = .0070; median OS, 11.1 v > 18 months, respectively; log-rank, P = .0029). CTCs before and after the initiation of therapy were strong, independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: Detection of CTCs before initiation of first-line therapy in patients with MBC is highly predictive of PFS and OS. This technology can aid in appropriate patient stratification and design of tailored treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.08.140

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,135

Metadata

Authors
Cristofanilli, M., Hayes, D. F., Budd, G. T., Ellis, M. J., Stopeck, A., Reuben, J. M., Doyle, G. V., Matera, J., Allard, W. J., Miller, M. C., Fritsche, H. A., Hortobagyi, G. N., & Terstappen, L. W. M. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1420-1430
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2170157144
Cited by
1,135
References
1
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating Tumor Cells: A Novel Prognostic Factor for Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.08.140
The paper
Cristofanilli, M., Hayes, D. F., Budd, G. T., Ellis, M. J., Stopeck, A., Reuben, J. M., Doyle, G. V., Matera, J., Allard, W. J., Miller, M. C., Fritsche, H. A., Hortobagyi, G. N., & Terstappen, L. W. M. M. (2005). Circulating Tumor Cells: A Novel Prognostic Factor for Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.08.140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.