Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Docetaxel Response in Human Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling

Iwao-Koizumi, Kyoko, Matoba, Ryo, Ueno, Noriko, Kim, Seung Jin, Ando, Akiko, Miyoshi, Yasuo, Maeda, Eisaku, Noguchi, Shinzaburo, Kato, Kikuya·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Docetaxel is one of the most effective anticancer drugs available in the treatment of breast cancer. Nearly half of the treated patients, however, do not respond to chemotherapy and suffer from side effects. The ability to reliably predict a patient's response based on tumor gene expression will improve therapeutic decision making and save patients from unnecessary side effects. Patients and Methods: A total of 44 breast tumor tissues were sampled by biopsy before treatment with docetaxel, and the response to therapy was clinically evaluated by the degree of reduction in tumor size. Gene expression profiling of the biopsy samples was performed with 2,453 genes using a high-throughput reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction technique. Using genes differentially expressed between responders and nonresponders, a diagnostic system based on the weighted-voting algorithm was constructed. Results: This system predicted the clinical response of 26 previously unanalyzed samples with over 80% accuracy, a level promising for clinical applications. Diagnostic profiles in nonresponders were characterized by elevated expression of genes controlling the cellular redox environment (ie, redox genes, such as thioredoxin, glutathione-S-transferase, and peroxiredoxin). Overexpression of these genes protected cultured mammary tumor cells from docetaxel-induced cell death, suggesting that enhancement of the redox system plays a major role in docetaxel resistance. Conclusion: These results suggest that the clinical response to docetaxel can be predicted by gene expression patterns in biopsy samples. The results also suggest that one of the molecular mechanisms of the resistance is activation of a group of redox genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.09.078

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Iwao-Koizumi, K., Matoba, R., Ueno, N., Kim, S. J., Ando, A., Miyoshi, Y., Maeda, E., Noguchi, S., & Kato, K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-01-20
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
422-431
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2140486627
Cited by
309
References
28
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Docetaxel Response in Human Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.09.078
The paper
Iwao-Koizumi, K., Matoba, R., Ueno, N., Kim, S. J., Ando, A., Miyoshi, Y., Maeda, E., Noguchi, S., & Kato, K. (2005). Prediction of Docetaxel Response in Human Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.09.078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.