The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Regulatory T Cells Enables the Identification of High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients and Those at Risk of Late Relapse
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells (T R) in breast cancer patients with long-term follow-up. Patients and Methods: FOXP3-positive T R were detected by immunohistochemistry with our new, extensively characterized FOXP3 monoclonal antibody, 236A/E7. Numbers of FOXP3-positive lymphocytes in tissue microarray cores from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 62), invasive breast cancer (n = 237) or from comparable areas of normal terminal duct lobular breast tissue (n = 10) were determined. A median cutoff of ≥ 15 defined patients with high numbers of T R. Results: T R numbers were significantly higher in in situ and invasive breast carcinomas than in normal breast; invasive tumors have significantly higher numbers than DCIS (P = .001). High numbers of FOXP3-positive T R identified patients with DCIS at increased risk of relapse (P = .04) and patients with invasive tumors with both shorter relapse-free (P = .004) and overall survival (P = .007). High T R numbers were present in high-grade tumors (P ≤ .001), in patients with lymph node involvement (P = .01), and in estrogen receptor (ER) –negative tumors (P = .001). Importantly, high numbers of T R within ER-positive tumors identified high-risk patients (P = .005). Unlike conventional clinicopathologic factors, high numbers of FOXP3-positive T R can identify patients at risk of relapse after 5 years. Conclusion: These findings indicate that quantification of FOXP3-positive T R in breast tumors is valuable for assessing disease prognosis and progression, and that T R are an important therapeutic target for breast cancer. FOXP3-positive T R represent a novel marker for identifying late-relapse patients who may benefit from aromatase therapy after standard tamoxifen treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Curiel, T. J., Coukos, G., Zou, L., Alvarez, X., Cheng, P., Mottram, P., Evdemon-Hogan, M., Conejo-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, L., Burow, M., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1093 · Cited by 5,151
Cited by
Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis
Quail, D. F., & Joyce, J. A. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3394 · Cited by 7,994
The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome
Fridman, W. H., Pagès, F., Sautès-Fridman, C., & Galon, J. (2012) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3245 · Cited by 4,981
Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy
Tanaka, A., & Sakaguchi, S. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2016.151 · Cited by 1,860
The tumor microenvironment at a glance
Balkwill, F. R., Capasso, M., & Hagemann, T. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.116392 · Cited by 1,857
CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumour immunity
Goel, S., DeCristo, M. J., Watt, A. C., BrinJones, H., Sceneay, J., Li, B. B., Khan, N., Ubellacker, J. M., Xie, S., Metzger-Filho, O., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23465 · Cited by 1,513
Metadata
- Authors
- Bates, G. J., Fox, S. B., Han, C., Leek, R. D., Garcia, J. F., Harris, A. L., & Banham, A. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 5373-5380
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2140633375
- Cited by
- 1,200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Regulatory T Cells Enables the Identification of High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients and Those at Risk of Late Relapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.05.9584
- The paper
- Bates, G. J., Fox, S. B., Han, C., Leek, R. D., Garcia, J. F., Harris, A. L., & Banham, A. H. (2006). Quantification of Regulatory T Cells Enables the Identification of High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients and Those at Risk of Late Relapse. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.05.9584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.