Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 814

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Correlates of Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Heinrich, Michael C., Corless, Christopher L., Blanke, Charles D., Demetri, George D., Joensuu, Heikki, Roberts, Peter J., Eisenberg, Burton L., von Mehren, Margaret, Fletcher, Christopher D.M., Sandau, Katrin, McDougall, Karen, Ou, Wen-bin, Chen, Chang-Jie, Fletcher, Jonathan A.·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) commonly harbor oncogenic mutations of the KIT or platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) kinases, which are targets for imatinib. In clinical studies, 75% to 90% of patients with advanced GISTs experience clinical benefit from imatinib. However, imatinib resistance is an increasing clinical problem. Patients and Methods: One hundred forty-seven patients with advanced, unresectable GISTs were enrolled onto a randomized, phase II clinical study of imatinib. Specimens from pretreatment and/or imatinib-resistant tumors were analyzed to identify molecular correlates of imatinib resistance. Secondary kinase mutations of KIT or PDGFRA that were identified in imatinib-resistant GISTs were biochemically profiled for imatinib sensitivity. Results: Molecular studies were performed using specimens from 10 patients with primary and 33 patients with secondary resistance. Imatinib-resistant tumors had levels of activated KIT that were similar to or greater than those typically found in untreated GISTs. Secondary kinase mutations were rare in GISTs with primary resistance but frequently found in GISTs with secondary resistance (10% v 67%; P = .002). Evidence for clonal evolution and/or polyclonal secondary kinase mutations was seen in three (18.8%) of 16 patients. Secondary kinase mutations were nonrandomly distributed and were associated with decreased imatinib sensitivity compared with typical KIT exon 11 mutations. Using RNAi technology, we demonstrated that imatinib-resistant GIST cells remain dependent on KIT kinase activity for activation of critical downstream signaling pathways. Conclusion: Different molecular mechanisms are responsible for primary and secondary imatinib resistance in GISTs. These findings have implications for future approaches to the growing problem of imatinib resistance in patients with advanced GISTs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.06.2265

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 814

Metadata

Authors
Heinrich, M. C., Corless, C. L., Blanke, C. D., Demetri, G. D., Joensuu, H., Roberts, P. J., Eisenberg, B. L., von Mehren, M., Fletcher, C. D. M., Sandau, K., McDougall, K., Ou, W.-B., Chen, C.-J., & Fletcher, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-10-10
Volume
24
Issue
29
Pages
4764-4774
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2103304755
Cited by
814
References
31
FWCI
44.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Correlates of Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.06.2265
The paper
Heinrich, M. C., Corless, C. L., Blanke, C. D., Demetri, G. D., Joensuu, H., Roberts, P. J., Eisenberg, B. L., von Mehren, M., Fletcher, C. D. M., Sandau, K., McDougall, K., Ou, W.-B., Chen, C.-J., & Fletcher, J. A. (2006). Molecular Correlates of Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.06.2265

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.