The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Integrated Genomic-Based Approach to Individualized Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop an integrated genomic-based approach to personalized treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. We have used gene expression profiles to identify patients likely to be resistant to primary platinum-based chemotherapy and also to identify alternate targeted therapeutic options for patients with de novo platinum-resistant disease. Patients and Methods: A gene expression model that predicts response to platinum-based therapy was developed using a training set of 83 advanced-stage serous ovarian cancers and tested on a 36-sample external validation set. In parallel, expression signatures that define the status of oncogenic signaling pathways were evaluated in 119 primary ovarian cancers and 12 ovarian cancer cell lines. In an effort to increase chemotherapy sensitivity, pathways shown to be activated in platinum-resistant cancers were subject to targeted therapy in ovarian cancer cell lines. Results: Gene expression profiles identified patients with ovarian cancer likely to be resistant to primary platinum-based chemotherapy with greater than 80% accuracy. In patients with platinum-resistant disease, we identified expression signatures consistent with activation of Src and Rb/E2F pathways, components of which were successfully targeted to increase response in ovarian cancer cell lines. Conclusion: We have defined a strategy for treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer that uses therapeutic stratification based on predictions of response to chemotherapy, coupled with prediction of oncogenic pathway deregulation, as a method to direct the use of targeted agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of cancer multidrug resistance: a still unsolved problem
Lage, H. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-8111-5 · Cited by 408
Caveats and pitfalls of ROC analysis in clinical microarray research (and how to avoid them)
Berrar, D., & Flach, P. (2012) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbr008 · Cited by 136
Phosphosignature predicts dasatinib response in non-small cell lung cancer
Klammer, M., Kaminski, M., Zedler, A., Oppermann, F., Blencke, S., Marx, S., Müller, S., Tebbe, A., Godl, K., & Schaab, C. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.016410 · Cited by 118
Time to recurrence and survival in serous ovarian tumors predicted from integrated genomic profiles
Mankoo, P. K., Shen, R., Schultz, N., Levine, D. A., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024709 · Cited by 104
Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information
Kim, S., Park, T., & Kon, M. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.003 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Dressman, H. K., Berchuck, A., Chan, G., Zhai, J., Bild, A., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Clarke, J., Whitaker, R. S., Li, L., Gray, J., Marks, J., Ginsburg, G. S., Potti, A., West, M., Nevins, J. R., & Lancaster, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-02-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 517-525
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2113629984
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Integrated Genomic-Based Approach to Individualized Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.06.3743
- The paper
- Dressman, H. K., Berchuck, A., Chan, G., Zhai, J., Bild, A., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Clarke, J., Whitaker, R. S., Li, L., Gray, J., Marks, J., Ginsburg, G. S., Potti, A., West, M., Nevins, J. R., & Lancaster, J. M. (2007). An Integrated Genomic-Based Approach to Individualized Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.06.3743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.