The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic Imaging Predicts Response, Survival, and Recurrence in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction
Abstract
Purpose: A previous study suggested that measurement of therapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism by positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) allows to select patients most likely to benefit from preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). The aim of this study was to prospectively validate these findings by using an a priori definition of metabolic response. Patients and Methods: Sixty-five patients with locally advanced AEGs were included. Tumor glucose utilization was quantitatively assessed by FDG-PET before chemotherapy and 14 days after initiation of therapy. Patients were classified as metabolic responders when the metabolic activity of the primary tumor had decreased by more than 35% at the time of the second PET. Results: Metabolic responders showed a high histopathologic response rate (44%) with a 3-year survival rate of 70%. In contrast, prognosis was poor for metabolic nonresponders with a histopathologic response rate of 5% (P = .001) and a 3-year survival rate of 35% (P = .01). A multivariate analysis (covariates: ypT-, ypN-category, histopathologic response) demonstrated that metabolic response was the only factor predicting recurrence (P = .018) in the subgroup of completely resected (R0) patients. Conclusion: This study prospectively demonstrates that changes in tumor metabolic activity during chemotherapy predict response, prognosis, and recurrence. These data provide the basis for clinical trials in which preoperative treatment is changed for patients without a metabolic response early in the course of therapy. PET-guided induction therapy may even be applicable to earlier tumor stages because surgery is only minimally delayed in nonresponding patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone for Localized Esophageal Cancer
Kelsen, D. P., Ginsberg, R., Pajak, T. F., Sheahan, D. G., Gunderson, L., Mortimer, J., Estes, N., Haller, D. G., Ajani, J., Kocha, W., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199812313392704 · Cited by 1,343
Shimada, Y., Watanabe, G., Yamasaki, S., Maeda, M., Kawabe, A., Kaganoi, J.-I., Itami, A., Fukumoto, M., Kanda, Y., & Imamura, M. (2000) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00049-6 · Cited by 32
Cited by
PET/CT imaging in cancer: current applications and future directions
Farwell, M. D., Pryma, D. A., & Mankoff, D. A. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28860 · Cited by 230
Impact of the Definition of Peak Standardized Uptake Value on Quantification of Treatment Response
Vanderhoek, M., Perlman, S. B., & Jeraj, R. (2012) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.093443 · Cited by 188
Hagen, P. V., Heijl, M. V., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Boellaard, R., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Kate, F. J. W. T., Dekken, H. V., Hoekstra, O. S., Sloof, G. W., & Lanschot, J. J. B. V. (2017) · Diseases of the Esophagus · doi:10.1111/dote.12479 · Cited by 58
Vanderhoek, M., Perlman, S. B., & Jeraj, R. (2013) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.113332 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, K., Weber, W. A., Lordick, F., Becker, K., Busch, R., Herrmann, K., Wieder, H., Fink, U., Schwaiger, M., & Siewert, J.-R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 4692-4698
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2147047466
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Imaging Predicts Response, Survival, and Recurrence in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.06.7801
- The paper
- Ott, K., Weber, W. A., Lordick, F., Becker, K., Busch, R., Herrmann, K., Wieder, H., Fink, U., Schwaiger, M., & Siewert, J.-R. (2006). Metabolic Imaging Predicts Response, Survival, and Recurrence in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.06.7801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.