Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Fisher, Richard I., Bernstein, Steven H., Kahl, Brad S., Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Robertson, Michael J., de Vos, Sven, Epner, Elliot, Krishnan, Amrita, Leonard, John P., Lonial, Sagar, Stadtmauer, Edward A., O'Connor, Owen A., Shi, Hongliang, Boral, Anthony L., Goy, André·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate response rate, duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety of bortezomib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients and Methods: Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for up to 17 cycles. Response and progression were determined using International Workshop Response Criteria, both using data from independent radiology review and by the investigators. Primary efficacy analyses were based on data from independent radiology review. Results: In total, 155 patients were treated. Median number of prior therapies was one (range, one to three). Response rate in 141 assessable patients was 33% including 8% complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR. Median DOR was 9.2 months. Median TTP was 6.2 months. Results by investigator assessments were similar. Median OS has not been reached after a median follow-up of 13.4 months. The safety profile of bortezomib was similar to previous experience in relapsed multiple myeloma. The most common adverse events grade 3 or higher were peripheral neuropathy (13%), fatigue (12%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Death from causes that were considered to be treatment related was reported for 3% of patients. Conclusion: These results confirm the activity of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory MCL, with predictable and manageable toxicities. Bortezomib provides significant clinical activity in terms of durable and complete responses, and may therefore represent a new treatment option for this population with usually very poor outcome. Studies of bortezomib-based combinations in MCL are ongoing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.07.9665

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 704

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, R. I., Bernstein, S. H., Kahl, B. S., Djulbegovic, B., Robertson, M. J., de Vos, S., Epner, E., Krishnan, A., Leonard, J. P., Lonial, S., Stadtmauer, E. A., O'Connor, O. A., Shi, H., Boral, A. L., & Goy, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-10-20
Volume
24
Issue
30
Pages
4867-4874
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2147422161
Cited by
704
References
2
FWCI
28.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.07.9665
The paper
Fisher, R. I., Bernstein, S. H., Kahl, B. S., Djulbegovic, B., Robertson, M. J., de Vos, S., Epner, E., Krishnan, A., Leonard, J. P., Lonial, S., Stadtmauer, E. A., O'Connor, O. A., Shi, H., Boral, A. L., & Goy, A. (2006). Multicenter Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.9665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.