Cited by 744Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The role of ubiquitination in tumorigenesis and targeted drug discovery

Open access
Deng, Lu, Meng, Tong, Chen, Lei, Wei, Wenyi, Wang, Ping·2020·Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Abstract

Ubiquitination, an important type of protein posttranslational modification (PTM), plays a crucial role in controlling substrate degradation and subsequently mediates the “quantity” and “quality” of various proteins, serving to ensure cell homeostasis and guarantee life activities. The regulation of ubiquitination is multifaceted and works not only at the transcriptional and posttranslational levels (phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, etc.) but also at the protein level (activators or repressors). When regulatory mechanisms are aberrant, the altered biological processes may subsequently induce serious human diseases, especially various types of cancer. In tumorigenesis, the altered biological processes involve tumor metabolism, the immunological tumor microenvironment (TME), cancer stem cell (CSC) stemness and so on. With regard to tumor metabolism, the ubiquitination of some key proteins such as RagA, mTOR, PTEN, AKT, c-Myc and P53 significantly regulates the activity of the mTORC1, AMPK and PTEN-AKT signaling pathways. In addition, ubiquitination in the TLR, RLR and STING-dependent signaling pathways also modulates the TME. Moreover, the ubiquitination of core stem cell regulator triplets (Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2) and members of the Wnt and Hippo-YAP signaling pathways participates in the maintenance of CSC stemness. Based on the altered components, including the proteasome, E3 ligases, E1, E2 and deubiquitinases (DUBs), many molecular targeted drugs have been developed to combat cancer. Among them, small molecule inhibitors targeting the proteasome, such as bortezomib, carfilzomib, oprozomib and ixazomib, have achieved tangible success. In addition, MLN7243 and MLN4924 (targeting the E1 enzyme), Leucettamol A and CC0651 (targeting the E2 enzyme), nutlin and MI‐219 (targeting the E3 enzyme), and compounds G5 and F6 (targeting DUB activity) have also shown potential in preclinical cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the latest progress in understanding the substrates for ubiquitination and their special functions in tumor metabolism regulation, TME modulation and CSC stemness maintenance. Moreover, potential therapeutic targets for cancer are reviewed, as are the therapeutic effects of targeted drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41392-020-0107-0

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ubiquitin-proteasome system controls core signaling factor abundance by selective degradation, mediates many processes in embryonic development, and aberrant UPS-dependent degradation is involved in carcinogenesis.

    “The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) provides an essential way to control core signaling factor abundance by selective degradation, such that it mediates many processes in embryonic development, also aberrant regulations of UPS-dependent degradation are involved in different pathological processes especially carcinogenesis22,23.”

    From Proteostatic reactivation of the developmental transcription factor TBX3 drives BRAF/MAPK-mediated tumorigenesis (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The UPS section describes protein degradation and links UPS dysfunction to cancer; the Oct4 and Sox2 ubiquitination sections give examples of selective degradation of core regulatory factors. The CSC stemness section mentions embryonic development and UPS-regulated stem-cell processes, but it does not establish the broader claim that the UPS mediates many processes in embryonic development. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 487

  1. [1]Shmueli A Oren M Life, death, and ubiquitin: taming the mule Cell 2005 121 963 965 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.018 15989944 · DOI
  2. [2]Lopez-Otin C Hunter T The regulatory crosstalk between kinases and proteases in cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010 10 278 292 10.1038/nrc2823 20300104 · DOI
  3. [3]Suryadinata R Roesley SN Yang G Sarcevic B Mechanisms of generating polyubiquitin chains of different topology Cells 2014 3 674 689 10.3390/cells3030674 24987835 PMC4197637 · DOI
  4. [4]Ikeda F Dikic I Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. ‘Protein Modifications: Beyond the Usual Suspects’ review series EMBO Rep. 2008 9 536 542 10.1038/embor.2008.93 18516089 PMC2427391 · DOI
  5. [5]Rajalingam K Dikic I SnapShot: expanding the ubiquitin code Cell 2016 164 1074 1074.e1071 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.019 26919436 · DOI
  6. [6]Gross S Targeting cancer with kinase inhibitors J. Clin. Invest. 2015 125 1780 1789 10.1172/JCI76094 25932675 PMC4463189 · DOI
  7. [7]Morrow JK Lin HK Sun SC Zhang S Targeting ubiquitination for cancer therapies Future Med. Chem. 2015 7 2333 2350 10.4155/fmc.15.148 26630263 PMC4976843 · DOI
  8. [8]Hoeller D Hecker CM Dikic I Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in cancer pathogenesis Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006 6 776 788 10.1038/nrc1994 16990855 · DOI
  9. [9]Mansour MA Ubiquitination: friend and foe in cancer Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018 101 80 93 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.06.001 29864543 · DOI
  10. [10]Telerman A Amson R The molecular programme of tumour reversion: the steps beyond malignant transformation Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009 9 206 216 10.1038/nrc2589 19180095 · DOI
  11. [11]Hoeller D Dikic I Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy Nature 2009 458 438 444 10.1038/nature07960 19325623 · DOI
  12. [12]Senft D Qi J Ronai ZA Ubiquitin ligases in oncogenic transformation and cancer therapy Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018 18 69 88 10.1038/nrc.2017.105 29242641 PMC6054770 · DOI
  13. [13]Komander D Rape M The ubiquitin code Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012 81 203 229 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328 22524316 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [14]Husnjak K Dikic I Ubiquitin-binding proteins: decoders of ubiquitin-mediated cellular functions Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012 81 291 322 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051810-094654 22482907 · DOI
  15. [15]Koyano F Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by PINK1 to activate parkin Nature 2014 510 162 166 10.1038/nature13392 24784582 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [16]Kane LA PINK1 phosphorylates ubiquitin to activate Parkin E3 ubiquitin ligase activity J. Cell Biol. 2014 205 143 153 10.1083/jcb.201402104 24751536 PMC4003245 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [17]Kazlauskaite A Parkin is activated by PINK1-dependent phosphorylation of ubiquitin at Ser65 Biochem. J. 2014 460 127 139 10.1042/BJ20140334 24660806 PMC4000136 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [18]Wauer T Ubiquitin Ser65 phosphorylation affects ubiquitin structure, chain assembly and hydrolysis EMBO J. 2015 34 307 325 10.15252/embj.201489847 25527291 PMC4339119 · DOI
  19. [19]Swaney DL Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation Nat. Methods 2013 10 676 682 10.1038/nmeth.2519 23749301 PMC3868471 · DOI
  20. [20]Hunter T The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond Mol. Cell 2007 28 730 738 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.019 18082598 · DOI
  21. [21]Lundby A Proteomic analysis of lysine acetylation sites in rat tissues reveals organ specificity and subcellular patterns Cell Rep. 2012 2 419 431 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.006 22902405 PMC4103158 · DOI
  22. [22]Webb K Bennett EJ Eavesdropping on PTM cross-talk through serial enrichment Nat. Methods 2013 10 620 621 10.1038/nmeth.2526 23807195 · DOI
  23. [23]Peng J A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination Nat. Biotechnol. 2003 21 921 926 10.1038/nbt849 12872131 · DOI
  24. [25]Ciechanover A Heller H Katz-Etzion R Hershko A Activation of the heat-stable polypeptide of the ATP-dependent proteolytic system Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1981 78 761 765 10.1073/pnas.78.2.761 6262770 PMC319882 · DOI
  25. [26]Ye Y Rape M Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009 10 755 764 10.1038/nrm2780 19851334 PMC3107738 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [27]Stewart MD Ritterhoff T Klevit RE Brzovic PS E2 enzymes: more than just middle men Cell Res. 2016 26 423 440 10.1038/cr.2016.35 27002219 PMC4822130 · DOI
  27. [28]Varshavsky A The ubiquitin system, an immense realm Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012 81 167 176 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051910-094049 22663079 · DOI
  28. [29]Hershko A Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation J. Biol. Chem. 1988 263 15237 15240 2844803
  29. [30]Geng L Huntoon CJ Karnitz LM RAD18-mediated ubiquitination of PCNA activates the Fanconi anemia DNA repair network J. Cell Biol. 2010 191 249 257 10.1083/jcb.201005101 20937699 PMC2958487 · DOI
  30. [31]Rezaeian AH A hypoxia-responsive TRAF6-ATM-H2AX signalling axis promotes HIF1alpha activation, tumorigenesis and metastasis Nat. Cell Biol. 2017 19 38 51 10.1038/ncb3445 27918549 PMC5441459 · DOI
  31. [32]Kwon YT Ciechanover A The ubiquitin code in the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017 42 873 886 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.09.002 28947091 · DOI
  32. [33]Bonnet J Devys D Tora L Histone H2B ubiquitination: signaling not scrapping Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2014 12 e19 e27 10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.09.002 25027370 · DOI
  33. [34]Pfleger CM Ubiquitin on ras: warden or partner in crime? Sci. Signal. 2011 4 pe12 10.1126/scisignal.2001874 21386093 PMC4495660 · DOI
  34. [35]Yau R Rape M The increasing complexity of the ubiquitin code Nat. Cell Biol. 2016 18 579 586 10.1038/ncb3358 27230526 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [36]Swatek KN Komander D Ubiquitin modifications Cell Res. 2016 26 399 422 10.1038/cr.2016.39 27012465 PMC4822133 · DOI
  36. [37]Hochstrasser M Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation Annu. Rev. Genet. 1996 30 405 439 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.405 8982460 · DOI
  37. [38]Chen ZJ Sun LJ Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling Mol. Cell 2009 33 275 286 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.014 19217402 · DOI
  38. [39]Xu P Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation Cell 2009 137 133 145 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.041 19345192 PMC2668214 · DOI
  39. [40]Elia AE Quantitative proteomic atlas of ubiquitination and acetylation in the DNA damage response Mol. Cell 2015 59 867 881 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.006 26051181 PMC4560960 · DOI
  40. [41]Michel MA Swatek KN Hospenthal MK Komander D Ubiquitin linkage-specific affimers reveal insights into K6-linked ubiquitin signaling Mol. Cell 2017 68 233 246.e235 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.020 28943312 PMC5640506 · DOI
  41. [42]Bremm A Komander D Emerging roles for Lys11-linked polyubiquitin in cellular regulation Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011 36 355 363 21641804
  42. [43]Matsumoto ML K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody Mol. Cell 2010 39 477 484 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.001 20655260 · DOI
  43. [45]Glauser L Sonnay S Stafa K Moore DJ Parkin promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of the mitochondrial fusion factor mitofusin 1 J. Neurochem. 2011 118 636 645 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07318.x 21615408 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [46]Metzger MB Weissman AM Working on a chain: E3s ganging up for ubiquitylation Nat. Cell Biol. 2010 12 1124 1126 10.1038/ncb1210-1124 21124306 · DOI
  45. [47]Hwang CS Shemorry A Auerbach D Varshavsky A The N-end rule pathway is mediated by a complex of the RING-type Ubr1 and HECT-type Ufd4 ubiquitin ligases Nat. Cell Biol. 2010 12 1177 1185 10.1038/ncb2121 21076411 PMC3003441 · DOI
  46. [48]Ye W TRIM8 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune response by blocking TRIF-TBK1 interaction J. Immunol. 2017 199 1856 1864 10.4049/jimmunol.1601647 28747347 · DOI
  47. [49]Miao Y Wu J Abraham SN Ubiquitination of innate immune regulator TRAF3 orchestrates expulsion of intracellular bacteria by exocyst complex Immunity 2016 45 94 105 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.023 27438768 PMC4968938 · DOI
  48. [50]Datta AB Hura GL Wolberger C The structure and conformation of Lys63-linked tetraubiquitin J. Mol. Biol. 2009 392 1117 1124 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.090 19664638 PMC2762427 · DOI
  49. [51]Kulathu Y Komander D Atypical ubiquitylation - the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond Lys48 and Lys63 linkages Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012 13 508 523 10.1038/nrm3394 22820888 · DOI
  50. [52]Takahashi TS Structural insights into two distinct binding modules for Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains in RNF168 Nat. Commun. 2018 9 170 10.1038/s41467-017-02345-y 29330428 PMC5766498 · DOI
  51. [53]Heger K OTULIN limits cell death and inflammation by deubiquitinating LUBAC Nature 2018 559 120 124 10.1038/s41586-018-0256-2 29950720 · DOI
  52. [54]Iwai K Fujita H Sasaki Y Linear ubiquitin chains: NF-kappaB signalling, cell death and beyond Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014 15 503 508 10.1038/nrm3836 25027653 · DOI
  53. [55]Ikeda F SHARPIN forms a linear ubiquitin ligase complex regulating NF-kappaB activity and apoptosis Nature 2011 471 637 641 10.1038/nature09814 21455181 PMC3085511 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [56]Boname JM Efficient internalization of MHC I requires lysine-11 and lysine-63 mixed linkage polyubiquitin chains Traffic 2010 11 210 220 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.01011.x 19948006 PMC3551259 · DOI
  55. [57]Morreale FE Walden H Types of ubiquitin ligases Cell 2016 165 248 248.e241 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.003 27015313 · DOI
  56. [58]Deshaies RJ Joazeiro CA RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009 78 399 434 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809 19489725 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [59]Metzger MB Hristova VA Weissman AM HECT and RING finger families of E3 ubiquitin ligases at a glance J. Cell Sci. 2012 125 531 537 10.1242/jcs.091777 22389392 PMC3381717 · DOI
  58. [61]Deng L The ubiquitination of rag A GTPase by RNF152 negatively regulates mTORC1 activation Mol. Cell 2015 58 804 818 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.033 25936802 · DOI
  59. [62]Chang LF Molecular architecture and mechanism of the anaphase-promoting complex Nature 2014 513 388 393 10.1038/nature13543 25043029 PMC4456660 · DOI
  60. [63]Skaar JR Pagan JK Pagano M SCF ubiquitin ligase-targeted therapies Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014 13 889 903 10.1038/nrd4432 25394868 PMC4410837 · DOI
  61. [64]Wang Z Liu P Inuzuka H Wei W Roles of F-box proteins in cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014 14 233 247 10.1038/nrc3700 24658274 PMC4306233 · DOI
  62. [65]Wang D E3 ubiquitin ligases in cancer and implications for therapies Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017 36 683 702 10.1007/s10555-017-9703-z 29043469 · DOI
  63. [66]Ostrowska H The ubiquitin-proteasome system: a novel target for anticancer and anti-inflammatory drug research Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2008 13 353 365 10.2478/s11658-008-0008-7 18311545 PMC6275582 · DOI
  64. [67]Wu WJ CDC20 overexpression predicts a poor prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer J. Transl. Med. 2013 11 142 10.1186/1479-5876-11-142 23758705 PMC3691738 · DOI
  65. [68]Fujita T Dissection of the APCCdh1-Skp2 cascade in breast cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2008 14 1966 1975 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1585 18381934 · DOI
  66. [69]Rotin D Kumar S Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009 10 398 409 10.1038/nrm2690 19436320 · DOI
  67. [70]Pickart CM Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001 70 503 533 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503 11395416 · DOI
  68. [71]Huang L Structure of an E6AP-UbcH7 complex: insights into ubiquitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade Science 1999 286 1321 1326 10.1126/science.286.5443.1321 10558980 · DOI
  69. [72]French ME Kretzmann BR Hicke L Regulation of the RSP5 ubiquitin ligase by an intrinsic ubiquitin-binding site J. Biol. Chem. 2009 284 12071 12079 10.1074/jbc.M901106200 19252184 PMC2673276 · DOI
  70. [73]Kim HC Huibregtse JM Polyubiquitination by HECT E3s and the determinants of chain type specificity Mol. Cell Biol. 2009 29 3307 3318 10.1128/MCB.00240-09 19364824 PMC2698738 · DOI
  71. [74]Kim HC Structure and function of a HECT domain ubiquitin-binding site EMBO Rep. 2011 12 334 341 10.1038/embor.2011.23 21399621 PMC3077248 · DOI
  72. [75]Bae SJ NEDD4 controls intestinal stem cell homeostasis by regulating the Hippo signalling pathway Nat. Commun. 2015 6 6314 10.1038/ncomms7314 25692647 · DOI
  73. [76]Ho KC Itch E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates large tumor suppressor 1 stability [corrected] Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 4870 4875 10.1073/pnas.1101273108 21383157 PMC3064387 · DOI
  74. [77]Moren A Degradation of the tumor suppressor Smad4 by WW and HECT domain ubiquitin ligases J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 22115 22123 10.1074/jbc.M414027200 15817471 · DOI
  75. [78]Imamura T Oshima Y Hikita A Regulation of TGF-beta family signalling by ubiquitination and deubiquitination J. Biochem. 2013 154 481 489 10.1093/jb/mvt097 24165200 · DOI
  76. [79]Dove KK Klevit RE RING-between-RING E3 ligases: emerging themes amid the variations J. Mol. Biol. 2017 429 3363 3375 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.08.008 28827147 PMC5675740 · DOI
  77. [80]Wenzel DM Lissounov A Brzovic PS Klevit RE UBCH7 reactivity profile reveals parkin and HHARI to be RING/HECT hybrids Nature 2011 474 105 108 10.1038/nature09966 21532592 PMC3444301 · DOI
  78. [81]Huang A E2-c-Cbl recognition is necessary but not sufficient for ubiquitination activity J. Mol. Biol. 2009 385 507 519 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.044 18996392 · DOI
  79. [83]Stieglitz B Structural basis for ligase-specific conjugation of linear ubiquitin chains by HOIP Nature 2013 503 422 426 10.1038/nature12638 24141947 PMC3838313 · DOI
  80. [84]Tokunaga F Iwai K LUBAC, a novel ubiquitin ligase for linear ubiquitination, is crucial for inflammation and immune responses Microbes Infect. 2012 14 563 572 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.01.011 22309894 · DOI
  81. [86]Wenzel DM Klevit RE Following Ariadne's thread: a new perspective on RBR ubiquitin ligases BMC Biol. 2012 10 24 10.1186/1741-7007-10-24 22420831 PMC3305615 · DOI
  82. [87]Duda DM Structure of HHARI, a RING-IBR-RING ubiquitin ligase: autoinhibition of an Ariadne-family E3 and insights into ligation mechanism Structure 2013 21 1030 1041 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.019 23707686 PMC3747818 · DOI
  83. [88]Kitada T Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism Nature 1998 392 605 608 10.1038/33416 9560156 · DOI · Paper page
  84. [89]Nussbaum RL Putting the parkin into Parkinson's Nature 1998 392 544 545 10.1038/33271 9560145 · DOI
  85. [90]Gong Y Pan-cancer genetic analysis identifies PARK2 as a master regulator of G1/S cyclins Nat. Genet. 2014 46 588 594 10.1038/ng.2981 24793136 PMC4251771 · DOI
  86. [91]Zhang X Parkin facilitates proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis via suppression of NF-kappaB activity in hepatocellular carcinoma Cell Death Dis. 2019 10 719 10.1038/s41419-019-1881-x 31558697 PMC6763437 · DOI
  87. [92]Qiu J Ubiquitination independent of E1 and E2 enzymes by bacterial effectors Nature 2016 533 120 124 10.1038/nature17657 27049943 PMC4905768 · DOI
  88. [93]Bhogaraju S Dikic I Cell biology: ubiquitination without E1 and E2 enzymes Nature 2016 533 43 44 10.1038/nature17888 27096359 · DOI
  89. [94]Wang Y Structural insights into non-canonical ubiquitination catalyzed by SidE Cell 2018 173 1231 1243.e1216 10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.023 29731171 · DOI
  90. [95]Bedford L Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system as drug targets Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011 10 29 46 10.1038/nrd3321 21151032 PMC7097807 · DOI · Paper page
  91. [96]Cappadocia L Lima CD Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation: structures, chemistry, and mechanism Chem. Rev. 2018 118 889 918 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00737 28234446 PMC5815371 · DOI
  92. [97]Schwechheimer C NEDD8-its role in the regulation of Cullin-RING ligases Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018 45 112 119 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.017 29909289 · DOI
  93. [98]Wei N Deng XW The COP9 signalosome Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003 19 261 286 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.112449 14570571 · DOI
  94. [99]Enchev RI Schulman BA Peter M Protein neddylation: beyond cullin-RING ligases Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015 16 30 44 10.1038/nrm3919 25531226 PMC5131867 · DOI
  95. [100]Kerscher O Felberbaum R Hochstrasser M Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006 22 159 180 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093503 16753028 · DOI
  96. [101]Seeler JS Dejean A SUMO and the robustness of cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017 17 184 197 10.1038/nrc.2016.143 28134258 · DOI
  97. [102]Gareau JR Lima CD The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010 11 861 871 10.1038/nrm3011 21102611 PMC3079294 · DOI
  98. [103]Geiss-Friedlander R Melchior F Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007 8 947 956 10.1038/nrm2293 18000527 · DOI
  99. [104]Lamoliatte F Large-scale analysis of lysine SUMOylation by SUMO remnant immunoaffinity profiling Nat. Commun. 2014 5 5409 10.1038/ncomms6409 25391492 · DOI
  100. [105]Bartek J Hodny Z SUMO boosts the DNA damage response barrier against cancer Cancer Cell 2010 17 9 11 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.030 20129245 · DOI
  101. [106]de The H Pandolfi PP Chen Z Acute promyelocytic leukemia: a paradigm for oncoprotein-targeted cure Cancer Cell. 2017 32 552 560 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.10.002 29136503 · DOI
  102. [107]Gartner A Muller S PML, SUMO, and RNF4: guardians of nuclear protein quality Mol. Cell 2014 55 1 3 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.022 24996060 · DOI
  103. [108]Dassouki Z ATL response to arsenic/interferon therapy is triggered by SUMO/PML/RNF4-dependent Tax degradation Blood 2015 125 474 482 10.1182/blood-2014-04-572750 25395419 · DOI
  104. [109]Komander D Clague MJ Urbe S Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009 10 550 563 10.1038/nrm2731 19626045 · DOI
  105. [110]David R DUBs' key to selectivity Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011 13 64 10.1038/nrm3268 22207339 · DOI
  106. [111]Virdee S Engineered diubiquitin synthesis reveals Lys29-isopeptide specificity of an OTU deubiquitinase Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010 6 750 757 10.1038/nchembio.426 20802491 · DOI
  107. [112]Cooper EM K63-specific deubiquitination by two JAMM/MPN+ complexes: BRISC-associated Brcc36 and proteasomal Poh1 EMBO J. 2009 28 621 631 10.1038/emboj.2009.27 19214193 PMC2666030 · DOI
  108. [113]Komander D Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63-linked and linear polyubiquitin chains EMBO Rep. 2009 10 466 473 10.1038/embor.2009.55 19373254 PMC2680876 · DOI
  109. [114]Sato Y Structures of CYLD USP with Met1- or Lys63-linked diubiquitin reveal mechanisms for dual specificity Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015 22 222 229 10.1038/nsmb.2970 25686088 · DOI
  110. [115]Wiener R Zhang X Wang T Wolberger C The mechanism of OTUB1-mediated inhibition of ubiquitination Nature 2012 483 618 622 10.1038/nature10911 22367539 PMC3319311 · DOI
  111. [116]Juang YC OTUB1 co-opts Lys48-linked ubiquitin recognition to suppress E2 enzyme function Mol. Cell 2012 45 384 397 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.011 22325355 PMC3306812 · DOI
  112. [117]Bonacci T Emanuele MJ Impressionist portraits of mitotic exit: APC/C, K11-linked ubiquitin chains and Cezanne Cell Cycle 2019 18 652 660 10.1080/15384101.2019.1593646 30874463 PMC6464587 · DOI
  113. [118]Bonacci, T. et al. Cezanne/OTUD7B is a cell cycle-regulated deubiquitinase that antagonizes the degradation of APC/C substrates. EMBO J. 37, e98701 (2018). PMC6092620 29973362
  114. [119]Licchesi JD An ankyrin-repeat ubiquitin-binding domain determines TRABID's specificity for atypical ubiquitin chains Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011 19 62 71 10.1038/nsmb.2169 22157957 PMC5260945 · DOI
  115. [120]Cummins JM Tumour suppression: disruption of HAUSP gene stabilizes p53 Nature 2004 428 1 2 10.1038/nature02501 15058298 · DOI · Paper page
  116. [121]Stevenson LF The deubiquitinating enzyme USP2a regulates the p53 pathway by targeting Mdm2 EMBO J. 2007 26 976 986 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601567 17290220 PMC1852834 · DOI · Paper page
  117. [123]Sun XX Challagundla KB Dai MS Positive regulation of p53 stability and activity by the deubiquitinating enzyme Otubain 1 EMBO J. 2012 31 576 592 10.1038/emboj.2011.434 22124327 PMC3273389 · DOI
  118. [124]Wiltshire TD Sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition identifies ubiquitin-specific peptidase 11 (USP11) as a regulator of DNA double-strand break repair J. Biol. Chem. 2010 285 14565 14571 10.1074/jbc.M110.104745 20233726 PMC2863164 · DOI
  119. [128]Shen K Sabatini DM Ragulator and SLC38A9 activate the Rag GTPases through noncanonical GEF mechanisms Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 9545 9550 10.1073/pnas.1811727115 30181260 PMC6156610 · DOI
  120. [129]Peng M Yin N Li MO Sestrins function as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors for Rag GTPases to control mTORC1 signaling Cell 2014 159 122 133 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.038 25259925 PMC4181352 · DOI · Paper page
  121. [131]Jin G Skp2-mediated RagA ubiquitination elicits a negative feedback to prevent amino-acid-dependent mTORC1 hyperactivation by recruiting GATOR1 Mol. Cell 2015 58 989 1000 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.010 26051179 PMC4476372 · DOI
  122. [132]Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012 149 274 293 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 22500797 PMC3331679 · DOI · Paper page
  123. [133]Sancak Y The Rag GTPases bind raptor and mediate amino acid signaling to mTORC1 Science 2008 320 1496 1501 10.1126/science.1157535 18497260 PMC2475333 · DOI · Paper page
  124. [134]Kim J Guan KL mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth Nat. Cell Biol. 2019 21 63 71 10.1038/s41556-018-0205-1 30602761 · DOI
  125. [135]Linares JF K63 polyubiquitination and activation of mTOR by the p62-TRAF6 complex in nutrient-activated cells Mol. Cell 2013 51 283 296 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.020 23911927 PMC3971544 · DOI
  126. [136]Mao JH FBXW7 targets mTOR for degradation and cooperates with PTEN in tumor suppression Science 2008 321 1499 1502 10.1126/science.1162981 18787170 PMC2849753 · DOI
  127. [138]Chen J KLHL22 activates amino-acid-dependent mTORC1 signalling to promote tumorigenesis and ageing Nature 2018 557 585 589 10.1038/s41586-018-0128-9 29769719 · DOI
  128. [139]Xie J Proud CG Signaling crosstalk between the mTOR complexes Translation (Austin) 2014 2 e28174 26779402 PMC4705829
  129. [140]Wang B TRAF2 and OTUD7B govern a ubiquitin-dependent switch that regulates mTORC2 signalling Nature 2017 545 365 369 10.1038/nature22344 28489822 PMC5695540 · DOI
  130. [141]Peterson TR DEPTOR is an mTOR inhibitor frequently overexpressed in multiple myeloma cells and required for their survival Cell 2009 137 873 886 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.046 19446321 PMC2758791 · DOI · Paper page
  131. [142]Duan S mTOR generates an auto-amplification loop by triggering the betaTrCP- and CK1alpha-dependent degradation of DEPTOR Mol. Cell 2011 44 317 324 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.005 22017877 PMC3212871 · DOI
  132. [143]Zhao Y Xiong X Sun Y DEPTOR, an mTOR inhibitor, is a physiological substrate of SCF(betaTrCP) E3 ubiquitin ligase and regulates survival and autophagy Mol. Cell 2011 44 304 316 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.029 22017876 PMC3216641 · DOI
  133. [144]Gao D mTOR drives its own activation via SCF(betaTrCP)-dependent degradation of the mTOR inhibitor DEPTOR Mol. Cell 2011 44 290 303 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.030 22017875 PMC3229299 · DOI
  134. [145]Zhao L OTUB1 protein suppresses mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) activity by deubiquitinating the mTORC1 inhibitor DEPTOR J. Biol. Chem. 2018 293 4883 4892 10.1074/jbc.M117.809533 29382726 PMC5880136 · DOI
  135. [147]Sengupta S Peterson TR Sabatini DM Regulation of the mTOR complex 1 pathway by nutrients, growth factors, and stress Mol. Cell 2010 40 310 322 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.026 20965424 PMC2993060 · DOI
  136. [148]Tee AR Tuberous sclerosis complex gene products, Tuberin and Hamartin, control mTOR signaling by acting as a GTPase-activating protein complex toward Rheb Curr. Biol. 2003 13 1259 1268 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00506-2 12906785 · DOI
  137. [149]Hu J WD40 protein FBW5 promotes ubiquitination of tumor suppressor TSC2 by DDB1-CUL4-ROC1 ligase Genes Dev. 2008 22 866 871 10.1101/gad.1624008 18381890 PMC2279197 · DOI
  138. [150]Deng L Ubiquitination of Rheb governs growth factor-induced mTORC1 activation Cell Res. 2019 29 136 150 10.1038/s41422-018-0120-9 30514904 PMC6355928 · DOI
  139. [151]Steinberg GR Carling D AMP-activated protein kinase: the current landscape for drug development Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019 18 527 551 10.1038/s41573-019-0019-2 30867601 · DOI
  140. [152]Han F The critical role of AMPK in driving Akt activation under stress, tumorigenesis and drug resistance Nat. Commun. 2018 9 4728 10.1038/s41467-018-07188-9 30413706 PMC6226490 · DOI
  141. [153]Green DR Galluzzi L Kroemer G Cell biology. Metabolic control of cell death Science 2014 345 1250256 10.1126/science.1250256 25237106 PMC4219413 · DOI
  142. [154]Pineda CT Degradation of AMPK by a cancer-specific ubiquitin ligase Cell 2015 160 715 728 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.034 25679763 PMC5629913 · DOI · Paper page
  143. [155]Deng M Deubiquitination and Activation of AMPK by USP10 Mol. Cell 2016 61 614 624 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010 26876938 PMC4836875 · DOI
  144. [156]Sanchez-Cespedes M A role for LKB1 gene in human cancer beyond the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Oncogene 2007 26 7825 7832 10.1038/sj.onc.1210594 17599048 · DOI
  145. [157]Hemminki A A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Nature 1998 391 184 187 10.1038/34432 9428765 · DOI
  146. [158]Jeon SM Chandel NS Hay N AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis to promote tumour cell survival during energy stress Nature 2012 485 661 665 10.1038/nature11066 22660331 PMC3607316 · DOI · Paper page
  147. [159]Lee SW Skp2-dependent ubiquitination and activation of LKB1 is essential for cancer cell survival under energy stress Mol. Cell 2015 57 1022 1033 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.015 25728766 PMC5337120 · DOI
  148. [160]Mallampalli RK Fbxl12 triggers G1 arrest by mediating degradation of calmodulin kinase I Cell. Signal. 2013 25 2047 2059 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.05.012 23707388 PMC3905573 · DOI
  149. [161]Dibble CC Cantley LC Regulation of mTORC1 by PI3K signaling Trends Cell Biol. 2015 25 545 555 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.06.002 26159692 PMC4734635 · DOI
  150. [163]Mossmann D Park S Hall MN mTOR signalling and cellular metabolism are mutual determinants in cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018 18 744 757 10.1038/s41568-018-0074-8 30425336 · DOI · Paper page
  151. [164]Wang X NEDD4-1 is a proto-oncogenic ubiquitin ligase for PTEN Cell 2007 128 129 139 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.039 17218260 PMC1828909 · DOI
  152. [165]Maddika S WWP2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for PTEN Nat. Cell Biol. 2011 13 728 733 10.1038/ncb2240 21532586 PMC3926303 · DOI
  153. [166]Van Themsche C Leblanc V Parent S Asselin E X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) regulates PTEN ubiquitination, content, and compartmentalization J. Biol. Chem. 2009 284 20462 20466 10.1074/jbc.C109.009522 19473982 PMC2742810 · DOI
  154. [167]Xu T The E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP/miR-92b/PTEN regulatory network contributes to tumorigenesis of glioblastoma Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017 7 289 300 28337377 PMC5336502
  155. [169]Lee, Y. R. et al. Reactivation of PTEN tumor suppressor for cancer treatment through inhibition of a MYC-WWP1 inhibitory pathway. Science. 364, eaau0159 (2019). PMC7081834 31097636
  156. [171]Zhang J Deubiquitylation and stabilization of PTEN by USP13 Nat. Cell Biol. 2013 15 1486 1494 10.1038/ncb2874 24270891 PMC3951854 · DOI
  157. [172]Yuan L Deubiquitylase OTUD3 regulates PTEN stability and suppresses tumorigenesis Nat. Cell Biol. 2015 17 1169 1181 10.1038/ncb3218 26280536 · DOI
  158. [173]Liu P Cheng H Roberts TM Zhao JJ Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009 8 627 644 10.1038/nrd2926 19644473 PMC3142564 · DOI
  159. [174]Manning BD Cantley LC AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream Cell 2007 129 1261 1274 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 17604717 PMC2756685 · DOI · Paper page
  160. [175]Yang WL The E3 ligase TRAF6 regulates Akt ubiquitination and activation Science 2009 325 1134 1138 10.1126/science.1175065 19713527 PMC3008763 · DOI
  161. [176]Chan CH The Skp2-SCF E3 ligase regulates Akt ubiquitination, glycolysis, herceptin sensitivity, and tumorigenesis Cell 2012 149 1098 1111 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.065 22632973 PMC3586339 · DOI
  162. [177]Suizu F The E3 ligase TTC3 facilitates ubiquitination and degradation of phosphorylated Akt Dev. Cell 2009 17 800 810 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.007 20059950 · DOI
  163. [178]Su CH Akt phosphorylation at Thr308 and Ser473 is required for CHIP-mediated ubiquitination of the kinase Cell. Signal. 2011 23 1824 1830 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.06.018 21767636 · DOI
  164. [179]Fan CD Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of phospho-AKT dynamics by the ubiquitin E3 ligase, NEDD4-1, in the insulin-like growth factor-1 response J. Biol. Chem. 2013 288 1674 1684 10.1074/jbc.M112.416339 23195959 PMC3548477 · DOI
  165. [180]Bae S Akt is negatively regulated by the MULAN E3 ligase Cell Res. 2012 22 873 885 10.1038/cr.2012.38 22410793 PMC3343661 · DOI
  166. [181]Lim JH CYLD negatively regulates transforming growth factor-beta-signalling via deubiquitinating Akt Nat. Commun. 2012 3 771 10.1038/ncomms1776 22491319 PMC3337989 · DOI
  167. [182]de Jel MM Loss of CYLD accelerates melanoma development and progression in the Tg(Grm1) melanoma mouse model Oncogenesis 2019 8 56 10.1038/s41389-019-0169-4 31591386 PMC6779913 · DOI
  168. [183]Suenaga Naoki Kuramitsu Mimi Komure Kanae Kanemaru Ayumi Takano Kanako Ozeki Kazuya Nishimura Yuka Yoshida Ryoji Nakayama Hideki Shinriki Satoru Saito Hideyuki Jono Hirofumi Loss of Tumor Suppressor CYLD Expression Triggers Cisplatin Resistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019 20 20 5194 10.3390/ijms20205194 31635163 PMC6829433 · DOI
  169. [184]Guo J pVHL suppresses kinase activity of Akt in a proline-hydroxylation-dependent manner Science 2016 353 929 932 10.1126/science.aad5755 27563096 PMC5326551 · DOI
  170. [185]Guo J AKT methylation by SETDB1 promotes AKT kinase activity and oncogenic functions Nat. Cell Biol. 2019 21 226 237 10.1038/s41556-018-0261-6 30692625 PMC6377565 · DOI
  171. [186]Li R Akt SUMOylation regulates cell proliferation and tumorigenesis Cancer Res. 2013 73 5742 5753 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0538 23884910 · DOI
  172. [188]Stine ZE MYC, metabolism, and cancer Cancer Discov. 2015 5 1024 1039 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0507 26382145 PMC4592441 · DOI
  173. [189]Hsieh James J. Le Valerie H. Oyama Toshinao Ricketts Christopher J. Ho Thai Huu Cheng Emily H. Chromosome 3p Loss–Orchestrated VHL, HIF, and Epigenetic Deregulation in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018 36 36 3533 3539 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.2549 30372397 PMC6299341 · DOI
  174. [190]Denko NC Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008 8 705 713 10.1038/nrc2468 19143055 · DOI · Paper page
  175. [191]Parks SK Chiche J Pouyssegur J Disrupting proton dynamics and energy metabolism for cancer therapy Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013 13 611 623 10.1038/nrc3579 23969692 · DOI
  176. [194]Nakayama K Siah2 regulates stability of prolyl-hydroxylases, controls HIF1alpha abundance, and modulates physiological responses to hypoxia Cell 2004 117 941 952 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.001 15210114 · DOI
  177. [195]Cassavaugh JM Negative regulation of HIF-1alpha by an FBW7-mediated degradation pathway during hypoxia J. Cell Biochem. 2011 112 3882 3890 10.1002/jcb.23321 21964756 PMC3202039 · DOI · Paper page
  178. [196]Flugel D Gorlach A Kietzmann T GSK-3beta regulates cell growth, migration, and angiogenesis via Fbw7 and USP28-dependent degradation of HIF-1alpha Blood 2012 119 1292 1301 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375014 22144179 PMC3352078 · DOI
  179. [197]Kojima K p53 activation of mesenchymal stromal cells partially abrogates microenvironment-mediated resistance to FLT3 inhibition in AML through HIF-1alpha-mediated down-regulation of CXCL12 Blood 2011 118 4431 4439 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334136 21868571 PMC3204912 · DOI
  180. [198]Sun H TRAF6 upregulates expression of HIF-1alpha and promotes tumor angiogenesis Cancer Res. 2013 73 4950 4959 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0370 23722539 · DOI
  181. [199]Ju UI FBXO11 represses cellular response to hypoxia by destabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha mRNA Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015 464 1008 1015 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.037 26187670 · DOI
  182. [200]Bremm A Cezanne (OTUD7B) regulates HIF-1alpha homeostasis in a proteasome-independent manner EMBO Rep. 2014 15 1268 1277 10.15252/embr.201438850 25355043 PMC4264929 · DOI
  183. [201]Zhang Y Nrdp1 increases ischemia induced primary rat cerebral cortical neurons and pheochromocytoma cells apoptosis via downregulation of HIF-1alpha protein Front. Cell Neurosci. 2017 11 293 10.3389/fncel.2017.00293 28979191 PMC5611384 · DOI
  184. [205]Hydbring, P., Castell, A. & Larsson, L. G. MYC modulation around the CDK2/p27/SKP2 axis. Genes (Basel). 8, e174 (2017). PMC5541307 28665315
  185. [206]Jin J Harper JW A license to kill: transcriptional activation and enhanced turnover of Myc by the SCF(kp2) ubiquitin ligase Cancer Cell 2003 3 517 518 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00145-4 12842079 · DOI
  186. [207]Wei W The v-Jun point mutation allows c-Jun to escape GSK3-dependent recognition and destruction by the Fbw7 ubiquitin ligase Cancer Cell 2005 8 25 33 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.005 16023596 · DOI · Paper page
  187. [208]Popov N Schulein C Jaenicke LA Eilers M Ubiquitylation of the amino terminus of Myc by SCF(beta-TrCP) antagonizes SCF(Fbw7)-mediated turnover Nat. Cell Biol. 2010 12 973 981 10.1038/ncb2104 20852628 · DOI
  188. [209]Mei Z FBXO32 targets c-Myc for proteasomal degradation and inhibits c-Myc activity J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 16202 16214 10.1074/jbc.M115.645978 25944903 PMC4481220 · DOI
  189. [210]Paul I The ubiquitin ligase CHIP regulates c-Myc stability and transcriptional activity Oncogene 2013 32 1284 1295 10.1038/onc.2012.144 22543587 · DOI
  190. [211]Pan J USP37 directly deubiquitinates and stabilizes c-Myc in lung cancer Oncogene 2015 34 3957 3967 10.1038/onc.2014.327 25284584 · DOI
  191. [212]Sun XX The nucleolar ubiquitin-specific protease USP36 deubiquitinates and stabilizes c-Myc Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2015 112 3734 3739 10.1073/pnas.1411713112 25775507 PMC4378440 · DOI
  192. [213]Kessler JD A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis Science 2012 335 348 353 10.1126/science.1212728 22157079 PMC4059214 · DOI
  193. [216]Vucic D Dixit VM Wertz IE Ubiquitylation in apoptosis: a post-translational modification at the edge of life and death Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011 12 439 452 10.1038/nrm3143 21697901 · DOI
  194. [217]Brooks CL Gu W p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond Mol. Cell 2006 21 307 315 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.020 16455486 PMC3737769 · DOI · Paper page
  195. [218]Li M Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization Nature 2002 416 648 653 10.1038/nature737 11923872 · DOI
  196. [219]Harper JW Neddylating the guardian; Mdm2 catalyzed conjugation of Nedd8 to p53 Cell 2004 118 2 4 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.015 15242638 · DOI
  197. [220]Park JH Modification of DBC1 by SUMO2/3 is crucial for p53-mediated apoptosis in response to DNA damage Nat. Commun. 2014 5 5483 10.1038/ncomms6483 25406032 · DOI
  198. [222]Kaewkangsadan V Tumour-draining axillary lymph nodes in patients with large and locally advanced breast cancers undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): the crucial contribution of immune cells (effector, regulatory) and cytokines (Th1, Th2) to immune-mediated tumour cell death induced by NAC BMC Cancer 2018 18 123 10.1186/s12885-018-4044-z 29390966 PMC5795830 · DOI
  199. [224]Federico A Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in human carcinogenesis Int. J. Cancer 2007 121 2381 2386 10.1002/ijc.23192 17893868 · DOI · Paper page
  200. [225]Landskron G Chronic inflammation and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment J. Immunol. Res. 2014 2014 149185 10.1155/2014/149185 24901008 PMC4036716 · DOI · Paper page

200 of 487 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, L., Meng, T., Chen, L., Wei, W., & Wang, P.
Affiliations
  • Northwest A&F University (CN)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Deng, Lu
  • Wang, Ping
Venue
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Published
2020-02-29
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
2059-3635 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009097360
Cited by
744
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 19 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation of China | Key Programme (31830053)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81625019, 31801177, 81702659)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
ubiquitination, carcinogenesis, protein posttranslational modification, cancer metabolism, tumor microenvironment, cancer stem cells, proteasome inhibitors, E3 ubiquitin ligase, deubiquitinase, mTOR signaling, PTEN/AKT signaling, STING signaling, Wnt signaling, Hippo/YAP signaling, targeted cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Ubiquitination, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Tumor Microenvironment, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review