Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin for Rectal Cancer

Rödel, Claus, Liersch, Torsten, Hermann, Robert Michael, Arnold, Dirk, Reese, Thomas, Hipp, Matthias, Fürst, Alois, Schwella, Nimrod, Bieker, Michael, Hellmich, Gunter, Ewald, Hermann, Haier, Jörg, Lordick, Florian, Flentje, Michael, Sülberg, Heiko, Hohenberger, Werner, Sauer, Rolf·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the activity and safety of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) plus four cycles of adjuvant XELOX in patients with rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: One hundred ten patients with T3/T4 or N+ rectal cancer were entered onto the trial in 11 investigator sites and received preoperative RT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 1,650 mg/m 2 on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, and oxaliplatin was administered at 50 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Surgery was scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after completion of XELOX-RT. Four cycles of adjuvant XELOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 bid on days 1 to 14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1) were administered. The main end points were activity as assessed by the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and the feasibility of postoperative XELOX chemotherapy. Results: After XELOX-RT, 103 of 104 eligible patients underwent surgery; pCR was achieved in 17 patients (16%), one patient had ypT0N1 disease, and 53 patients showed tumor regression of more than 50% of the tumor mass. R0 resections were achieved in 95% of patients, and sphincter preservation was accomplished in 77%. Full-dose preoperative XELOX-RT was administered in 96%. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 12% of patients. Postoperative complication occurred in 43% of patients. Sixty percent of patients received all four cycles of adjuvant XELOX, with sensory neuropathy (18%) and diarrhea (12%) being the main grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusion: Preoperative XELOX-RT plus four cycles of adjuvant XELOX is an active and feasible treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based treatment with XELOX- based multimodality treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.08.3675

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Rödel, C., Liersch, T., Hermann, R. M., Arnold, D., Reese, T., Hipp, M., Fürst, A., Schwella, N., Bieker, M., Hellmich, G., Ewald, H., Haier, J., Lordick, F., Flentje, M., Sülberg, H., Hohenberger, W., & Sauer, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
110-117
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2097158913
Cited by
230
References
1
FWCI
11.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Phase II Trial of Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin for Rectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.3675
The paper
Rödel, C., Liersch, T., Hermann, R. M., Arnold, D., Reese, T., Hipp, M., Fürst, A., Schwella, N., Bieker, M., Hellmich, G., Ewald, H., Haier, J., Lordick, F., Flentje, M., Sülberg, H., Hohenberger, W., & Sauer, R. (2007). Multicenter Phase II Trial of Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin for Rectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.3675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.