The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific Secondary Genetic Alterations in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Provide Prognostic Information Independent of the Gene Expression–Based Proliferation Signature
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To compare the genetic relationship between cyclin D1–positive and cyclin D1–negative mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs) and to determine whether specific genetic alterations may add prognostic information to survival prediction based on the proliferation signature of MCLs. Patients and Methods: Seventy-one cyclin D1–positive and six cyclin D1–negative MCLs previously characterized by gene expression profiling were examined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Results: Cyclin D1–negative MCLs were genetically characterized by gains of 3q, 8q, and 15q, and losses of 1p, 8p23-pter, 9p21-pter, 11q21-q23, and 13q that were also the most common alterations in conventional MCLs. Parallel analysis of CGH aberrations and locus-specific gene expression profiles in cyclin D1–positive patients showed that chromosomal imbalances had a substantial impact on the expression levels of the genes located in the altered regions. The analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the proliferation signature, the number of chromosomal aberrations, gains of 3q, and losses of 8p, 9p, and 9q predicted survival of MCL patients. A multivariate analysis showed that the gene expression-based proliferation signature was the strongest predictor for shorter survival. However, 3q gains and 9q losses provided prognostic information that was independent of the proliferative activity. Conclusion: Cyclin D1–positive and –negative MCLs share the same secondary genetic aberrations, supporting the concept that they correspond to the same genetic entity. The integration of genetic information on chromosome 3q and 9q alterations into a proliferation signature-based model may improve the ability to predict survival in patients with MCL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jares, P., Colomer, D., & Campo, E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2230 · Cited by 466
Self-citationMozos, A., Royo, C., Hartmann, E., De Jong, D., Baro, C., Valera, A., Fu, K., Weisenburger, D. D., Delabie, J., Chuang, S.-S., et al. (2009) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.010264 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Salaverria, I., Zettl, A., Beà, S., Moreno, V., Valls, J., Hartmann, E., Ott, G., Wright, G., Lopez-Guillermo, A., Chan, W. C., Weisenburger, D. D., Gascoyne, R. D., Grogan, T. M., Delabie, J., Jaffe, E. S., Montserrat, E., Muller-Hermelink, H.-K., Staudt, L. M., Rosenwald, A., & Campo, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-04-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1216-1222
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1999047572
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific Secondary Genetic Alterations in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Provide Prognostic Information Independent of the Gene Expression–Based Proliferation Signature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4251
- The paper
- Salaverria, I., Zettl, A., Beà, S., Moreno, V., Valls, J., Hartmann, E., Ott, G., Wright, G., Lopez-Guillermo, A., Chan, W. C., Weisenburger, D. D., Gascoyne, R. D., Grogan, T. M., Delabie, J., Jaffe, E. S., Montserrat, E., Muller-Hermelink, H.-K., Staudt, L. M., Rosenwald, A., & Campo, E. (2007). Specific Secondary Genetic Alterations in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Provide Prognostic Information Independent of the Gene Expression–Based Proliferation Signature. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.