The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase IIB Multicenter Trial of Vorinostat in Patients With Persistent, Progressive, or Treatment Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in persistent, progressive, or recurrent mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) cutaneous t-cell lymphoma (CTCL) subtypes. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage IB-IVA MF/SS were treated with 400 mg of oral vorinostat daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity in this open-label phase IIb trial ( NCT00091559 ). Patients must have received at least two prior systemic therapies at least one of which included bexarotene unless intolerable. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) measured by the modified severity weighted assessment tool and secondary end points were time to response (TTR), time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR), and pruritus relief (≥ 3-point improvement on a 10-point visual analog scale). Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Seventy-four patients were enrolled, including 61 with at least stage IIB disease. The ORR was 29.7% overall; 29.5% in stage IIB or higher patients. Median TTR in stage IIB or higher patients was 56 days. Median DOR was not reached but estimated to be ≥ 185 days (34+ to 441+). Median TTP was 4.9 months overall, and ≥ 9.8 months for stage IIB or higher responders. Overall, 32% of patients had pruritus relief. The most common drug-related adverse experiences (AE) were diarrhea (49%), fatigue (46%), nausea (43%), and anorexia (26%); most were grade 2 or lower but those grade 3 or higher included fatigue (5%), pulmonary embolism (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and nausea (4%). Eleven patients required dose modification and nine discontinued due to AE. Conclusion: Oral vorinostat was effective in treatment refractory MF/SS with an acceptable safety profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy
Dawson, M. A., & Kouzarides, T. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013 · Cited by 3,203
A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome—biological and translational implications
Baylin, S. B., & Jones, P. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3130 · Cited by 2,871
New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment
West, A. C., & Johnstone, R. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci69738 · Cited by 1,404
FDA Approval Summary: Vorinostat for Treatment of Advanced Primary Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Mann, B. S., Johnson, J. R., Cohen, M. H., Justice, R., & Pazdur, R. (2007) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-10-1247 · Cited by 1,365
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors as Anticancer Drugs
Eckschlager, T., Plch, J., Stiborova, M., & Hrabeta, J. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18071414 · Cited by 1,206
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, E. A., Kim, Y. H., Kuzel, T. M., Pacheco, T. R., Foss, F. M., Parker, S., Frankel, S. R., Chen, C., Ricker, J. L., Arduino, J. M., & Duvic, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-07-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3109-3115
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2110957729
- Cited by
- 1,055
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase IIB Multicenter Trial of Vorinostat in Patients With Persistent, Progressive, or Treatment Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2434
- The paper
- Olsen, E. A., Kim, Y. H., Kuzel, T. M., Pacheco, T. R., Foss, F. M., Parker, S., Frankel, S. R., Chen, C., Ricker, J. L., Arduino, J. M., & Duvic, M. (2007). Phase IIB Multicenter Trial of Vorinostat in Patients With Persistent, Progressive, or Treatment Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.