The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients and Methods: In this single-arm phase II trial, oral continuous sorafenib was administered in 28-day cycles. Patients had ≤ one line of chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. At the end of stage 1, efficacy criteria for further accrual were not met, but the study was amended to enroll an additional five patients for paired tumor biopsies. Results: Twenty-seven and 26 patients were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. One patient (3.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 19.0%) achieved a partial response. Disease stabilization was maintained in 10 patients (37.0%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 61.2%). The median time to progression was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4 months), and median overall survival time was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 8.7 months). Sorafenib was well tolerated with few grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicities. Biomarker analysis of paired tumor samples before and after treatment with sorafenib revealed a decrease of pERK in all five patients, with a decrease in Ki67 in four patients, consistent with a disruption of ERK signaling. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 was downregulated in four patients, and there was also evidence of antiangiogenic activity. Conclusion: Sorafenib was well tolerated and had modest anticancer activity comparable to monotherapy with other targeted agents in this group of patients. Further development in combination with radiation or other agents may be warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
Davies, H., Bignell, G. R., Cox, C., Stephens, P., Edkins, S., Clegg, S., Teague, J., Woffendin, H., Garnett, M. J., Bottomley, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00766 · Cited by 10,674
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
Simon, R. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9 · Cited by 3,636
Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target
Ferrara, N., & Kerbel, R. S. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04483 · Cited by 2,653
Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer
Ferrara, N., Hillan, K. J., Gerber, H.-P., & Novotny, W. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1381 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Vasculogenic mimicry formation in EBV-associated epithelial malignancies
Xiang, T., Lin, Y.-X., Ma, W., Zhang, H.-J., Chen, K.-M., He, G.-P., Zhang, X., Xu, M., Feng, Q.-S., Chen, M.-Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07308-5 · Cited by 172
RetractedCampbell, L., Nuttall, R., Griffiths, D., & Gumbleton, M. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24389 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Elser, C., Siu, L. L., Winquist, E., Agulnik, M., Pond, G. R., Chin, S. F., Francis, P., Cheiken, R., Elting, J., McNabola, A., Wilkie, D., Petrenciuc, O., & Chen, E. X.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-08-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3766-3773
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1978580856
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.