Internet based double-blind cross-over clinical trial to test efficacy of high dose isoflavone soy in controlling breast cancer survivor hot flashes
Abstract
636 Background: Severe hot flashes are common after completion of allopathic breast cancer treatment. Hot flashes are rare in the Orient where high isoflavone soy diets are common. Methods: We enrolled breast cancer survivors experiencing hot flashes after the completion of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy into a 16 week double blind cross-over casein placebo controlled trial of a 160 mg isoflavone soy dietary supplement. Hot flash frequency, severity, and time of day, exercise time and patient journaling was recorded by an internet diary placed on a HIPPA compliant server with password access. Results: Of 168 patients enrolled, 117 actually participated in taking supplementation and completing internet diaries giving adequate data for analysis. Of this group 13 patients dropped out of study for failure to finish all dietary supplements throughout the study period. The hot flash data during the last 4 weeks on each supplement was compared to determine benefit. There was no statistical difference in hot flash frequency, intensity or duration between either supplement independent of exercise level. Interestingly, 82% of patients reported a decrease in hot flashes in the first 4 weeks of study independent of which supplement they were randomized to receive. The journal entries report during this “induction” period that the majority of patients had identified emotional or dietary or other triggers for their hot flashes. The avoidance of the triggers seemed to substantially reduce their reported menopausal symptoms. Conclusions: High dose soy isoflavone dietary supplementation is ineffective in reducing breast cancer survivor hot flashes. Journaling may have a benefit in allowing survivors to find their individual triggers for the most severe hot flashes. Internet patient data entry provides a unique and highly compliant tool for obtaining direct patient reporting in survivorship clinical trials. [Table: see text]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect of soy on hot flashes in breast cancer patients is not clear.
“The effect of soy on hot flashes in breast cancer patients is not clear.”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [127]
RCTs noted some improvements in hot flashes over time, but not in comparison to placebo.
“RCTs noted some improvements over time, but not in comparison to placebo [127-131].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [127]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dooley, W. C., Hendricks, C., Gusev, Y., & Shockney, L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-06-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 18_suppl
- Pages
- 636-636
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2733746429
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2013: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, hot flashes, menopausal symptoms, physical activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review