Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatic Resection After Rescue Cetuximab Treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases Previously Refractory to Conventional Systemic Therapy

Adam, René, Aloia, Thomas, Lévi, Francis, Wicherts, Dennis A., de Haas, Robbert J., Paule, Bernard, Bralet, Marie-Pierre, Bouchahda, Mohamed, Machover, David, Ducreux, Michel, Castagne, Vincent, Azoulay, Daniel, Castaing, Denis·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) resistant to first-line chemotherapy, the impact of cetuximab therapy on resectability is unknown. This study was performed to determine the post-cetuximab resectability rate and to examine postoperative outcomes for these heavily pretreated patients. Patients and Methods: From February 2004 to April 2006, we evaluated 151 patients with unresectable CLM resistant to initial chemotherapy and subsequently treated with systemic cetuximab. Resectability rates, patient outcomes, and tumoral and nontumoral liver pathology were assessed. Results: A total of 27 patients underwent surgery after a median of six cycles of cetuximab + irinotecan (20 of 27), oxaliplatin (four of 27), or both (one of 27). Eighteen patients (67%) had experienced treatment failure after at least two lines of chemotherapy before cetuximab. Twenty-five of the 27 patients who had surgery underwent hepatectomy: nine of 133 patients who were treated completely at our institution (resectability rate, 7%) and 16 of 18 patients who were referred from other institutions after systemic cetuximab therapy. Postoperative mortality was 3.7% (one of 27), with a complication rate of 50%. Histopathologic liver abnormalities were found in nine patients (36%), without specific lesions attributable to cetuximab. After median follow-up of 16 months, 23 of 25 patients who underwent resection (92%) were alive, and 10 patients (40%) were disease free. Median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from initiation of cetuximab therapy were 20 and 13 months, respectively. Conclusion: For CLM refractory to conventional chemotherapy, combination therapy with cetuximab increases resectability rates without increasing operative mortality or liver injury. The median OS and PFS of 20 and 13 months, respectively, suggest that this novel oncosurgical strategy benefits patients with previously refractory disease who respond subsequently to cetuximab.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.10.8126

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Adam, R., Aloia, T., Lévi, F., Wicherts, D. A., de Haas, R. J., Paule, B., Bralet, M.-P., Bouchahda, M., Machover, D., Ducreux, M., Castagne, V., Azoulay, D., & Castaing, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-10-10
Volume
25
Issue
29
Pages
4593-4602
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2099036520
Cited by
208
References
3
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Resection After Rescue Cetuximab Treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases Previously Refractory to Conventional Systemic Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8126
The paper
Adam, R., Aloia, T., Lévi, F., Wicherts, D. A., de Haas, R. J., Paule, B., Bralet, M.-P., Bouchahda, M., Machover, D., Ducreux, M., Castagne, V., Azoulay, D., & Castaing, D. (2007). Hepatic Resection After Rescue Cetuximab Treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases Previously Refractory to Conventional Systemic Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8126

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.