Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase I Study of Everolimus in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

Open access
Fouladi, Maryam, Laningham, Fred, Wu, Jianrong, O'Shaughnessy, Melinda A., Molina, Kristen, Broniscer, Alberto, Spunt, Sheri L., Luckett, Inga, Stewart, Clinton F., Houghton, Peter J., Gilbertson, Richard J., Furman, Wayne L.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Everolimus was administered orally at a daily dose of 2.1, 3, 5, or 6.5 mg/m 2 in cohorts of three to six patients per dosage level. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed during the first course. The phosphorylation status of various components of the mTOR signal pathway was assessed in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from treated patients. Results: There were 26 patients enrolled; 18 were assessable. DLTs included diarrhea (n = 1), mucositis (n = 1), and elevation of ALT (n = 1) at 6.5 mg/m 2. At the MTD of 5 mg/m 2, the median everolimus clearance was 15.2 L/h/m 2, with a plasma everolimus concentration-time area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity of 239.6 ng/mL·h. Significant inhibition of mTOR pathway signaling was observed in PBMCs from patients achieving AUCs ≥ 200 ng/mL·h, equivalent to dosages of 3 to 5 mg/m 2 of everolimus. No objective tumor responses were observed. Conclusion: Continuous, orally administered everolimus is well tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and demonstrates similar pharmacokinetic properties to those observed in adults. Everolimus significantly inhibits the mTOR signaling pathway in children at the MTD. The recommended phase II dose in children with solid tumors is 5 mg/m 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.11.4017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Fouladi, M., Laningham, F., Wu, J., O'Shaughnessy, M. A., Molina, K., Broniscer, A., Spunt, S. L., Luckett, I., Stewart, C. F., Houghton, P. J., Gilbertson, R. J., & Furman, W. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-10-20
Volume
25
Issue
30
Pages
4806-4812
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2069434008
Cited by
160
References
3
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Study of Everolimus in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.11.4017
The paper
Fouladi, M., Laningham, F., Wu, J., O'Shaughnessy, M. A., Molina, K., Broniscer, A., Spunt, S. L., Luckett, I., Stewart, C. F., Houghton, P. J., Gilbertson, R. J., & Furman, W. L. (2007). Phase I Study of Everolimus in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.11.4017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.