Cited by 162Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Inhibition of Histone Deacetylation: A Strategy for Tumor Radiosensitization

Camphausen, Kevin, Tofilon, Philip J.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Recently, strategies to enhance tumor radiosensitivity have begun to focus on targeting the molecules and processes that regulate cellular radioresponse. A molecular target that has begun to receive considerable attention is histone acetylation. Histone acetylation is determined by the dynamic interaction of two families of enzymes: histone acetylases and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Histone acetylation plays a role in regulating chromatin structure and gene expression—two parameters that have long been considered determinants of radioresponse. As a means of modifying histone acetylation status, considerable effort has been put into the development of inhibitors of HDAC activity. This has led to the generation of a relatively large number of structurally diverse compounds that can inhibit HDAC activity resulting in histone hyperacetylation. Many of the newer HDAC inhibitor compounds have been designed with better bioavailability or pharmacology than the first-generation compounds. Whereas a number of these second-generation HDAC inhibitors have antitumor activity in preclinical cancer models when delivered as single agents, early clinical data demonstrate only cytostasis when used as monotherapy. However, recent preclinical studies have indicated that HDAC inhibitors from structurally diverse classes can enhance both the in vitro and in vivo radiosensitivity of human tumor cell lines generated from a spectrum of solid tumors. HDAC inhibitors are in clinical trials as single modalities, in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, and recently, in combination with radiotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.11.6202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 162

Authors
Camphausen, K., & Tofilon, P. J.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-09-10
Volume
25
Issue
26
Pages
4051-4056
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2089417788
Cited by
162
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
histone deacetylase inhibitors, radiosensitization, histone acetylation, histone acetyltransferase, histone hyperacetylation, chromatin structure, gene expression regulation, radiation response, combined radiotherapy, solid tumors
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Animals, Histone Deacetylases, Histones, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation Tolerance, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review