Cited by 629DNA Repair MechanismsHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining

Open access
Miller, Kyle M, Tjeertes, Jorrit V, Coates, Julia, Legube, Gaëlle, Polo, Sophie E, Britton, Sébastien, Jackson, Stephen P·2010·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair occurs within chromatin and can be modulated by chromatin-modifying enzymes. Here we identify the related human histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 as two participants in the DNA-damage response. We show that acetylation of histone H3 Lys56 (H3K56) was regulated by HDAC1 and HDAC2 and that HDAC1 and HDAC2 were rapidly recruited to DNA-damage sites to promote hypoacetylation of H3K56. Furthermore, HDAC1- and 2-depleted cells were hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and showed sustained DNA-damage signaling, phenotypes that reflect defective DSB repair, particularly by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Collectively, these results show that HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response by promoting DSB repair and thus provide important insights into the radio-sensitizing effects of HDAC inhibitors that are being developed as cancer therapies.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

HDAC1 and HDAC2 are recruited to DNA-damage sites, where they promote H3K56 and H4K16 hypo-acetylation and are required for efficient DNA double-strand break repair, predominantly non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Their depletion causes hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and sustained DNA-damage signaling, linking HDAC1/2 function to the radio-sensitizing effects of HDAC inhibitors.

Key findings

  • HDAC1 and HDAC2, but not HDAC3 or HDAC8, localized to laser-induced DNA-damage sites; accumulation occurred within 5 minutes and was no longer visible after 30 minutes.
  • HDAC1/2 depletion caused hyper-acetylation of H3K56 and H4K16, and recombinant HDAC1 deacetylated these sites on calf histones in vitro, suggesting they are likely direct targets.
  • HDAC1/2-depleted cells were hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and phleomycin, showed sustained γH2AX, CHK1, CHK2 and p53 phosphorylation, and had markedly impaired repair of IR- and phleomycin-induced DSBs by comet assay.
  • HDAC1/2 depletion produced a modest reduction in homologous recombination and a major defect in NHEJ; it also increased DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation (S2056p) and ATM-mediated phosphorylation (T2609p), and enhanced Ku70/Artemis persistence at damage sites.

Methods

  • Cell-based study using human U2OS, HeLa and human diploid fibroblast cells, including a U2OS line with 4-OHT-inducible AsiSI-ER to generate site-specific DSBs.
  • HDAC1/2 function was tested by siRNA depletion, siRNA-resistant HDAC1 rescue, and Class I/II HDAC inhibitors TSA and NaB, with Sirtuin inhibition by nicotinamide and SIRT1/SIRT2 depletion as comparisons.
  • Main assays included western blotting, immunofluorescence, laser micro-irradiation, ChIP at AsiSI-induced DSBs, comet assays, an I-Sce1-based HR assay, random-plasmid integration for NHEJ, and live-cell imaging of GFP-Ku70 and GFP-Artemis.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it cannot rule out that HDAC1 and HDAC2 influence DSB repair by directly targeting NHEJ factors or other regulators, such as ATM, in addition to deacetylating histones.
  • The paper notes that H3K56Ac regulation may differ between organisms and genomic locations, citing contrasting findings for SIRT6 and mouse cells.
  • Evident from the text: the work relies mainly on cultured human cell lines and siRNA/inhibitor approaches, and the authors state that systematic identification of HDAC1/2 substrates remains needed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb.1899

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 12 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Activity of Class I/II HDACs is needed for H3K56Ac loss upon DNA damage induction.

    “the activity of such HDACs is also needed for H3K56Ac loss upon DNA damage induction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Class I/II HDAC inhibitors TSA and NaB specifically inhibit HDAC1/2 deacetylase activity.
  • Findingcitation

    H3K56 acetylation is negatively regulated by DNA damage in human cells.

    “we recently found that H3K9 and H3K56 acetylations (H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac) are negatively regulated by DNA damage20.”
    • Also stated in: § H3K56Ac levels are reduced upon DNA damage · boosted
      “Taken together, these results established that H3K56Ac levels are reduced at sites of DNA damage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Tjeertes, J.V., Miller, K.M. & Jackson, S.P. Screen for DNA-damage-responsive histone modifications identifies H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac in human cells. EMBO J. 28, 1878–1889 (2009). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The loss of H3K56Ac signal at DNA-damage sites reflects deacetylation of H3K56 rather than histone eviction or epitope masking.
  • Findingown data

    Class I/II HDACs regulate H3K56Ac levels under normal growth conditions.

    “This suggested that Class I/II HDACs regulate H3K56Ac levels under normal growth conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Class I/II HDAC inhibitors TSA and NaB specifically inhibit HDAC1/2 deacetylase activity.
  • Findingown data

    Depletion of HDAC3 does not yield H3K56Ac or H4K16Ac hyper-acetylation.

    “depletion of HDAC3, which we had found not to be detectably recruited to DNA-damage sites, did not yield H3K56Ac or H4K16Ac hyper-acetylation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The anti-H3K56Ac antibodies used are specific for H3K56Ac.
  • Findingown data

    Endogenous HDAC1 and HDAC2, but not HDAC3 or HDAC8, are recruited to sites of laser-induced DNA damage.

    “we could detect the recruitment of endogenous HDAC1 and HDAC2, but not HDAC3 or HDAC8, to sites of laser micro-irradiation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The laser micro-irradiation and AsiSI-ER systems produce DNA damage that is representative of physiological DSBs for studying HDAC1/2 recruitment and H3K56 deacetylation.
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    H4K16Ac is reduced by replicative senescence but enhanced upon oncogene-induced senescence.

    “H4K16Ac was reduced by replicative senescence but enhanced upon OIS”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    HDAC1/2 accumulation at DNA damage sites occurs within 5 minutes and declines, no longer visible after 30 minutes.

    “HDAC1/2 accumulation occurred within 5 minutes of DNA-damage induction and then gradually declined, being no longer visible after 30 minutes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    AsiSI-ER induction decreases H3K56Ac at DSB sites but not at a site without an AsiSI sequence.

    “AsiSI-ER induction decreased H3K56Ac at DSB sites, while no reduction was observed at another site that did not contain an AsiSI sequence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The loss of H3K56Ac signal at DNA-damage sites reflects deacetylation of H3K56 rather than histone eviction or epitope masking.
    • Rests on an assumption: The laser micro-irradiation and AsiSI-ER systems produce DNA damage that is representative of physiological DSBs for studying HDAC1/2 recruitment and H3K56 deacetylation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Class I/II HDAC inhibitors suppress H3K56 deacetylation at laser micro-irradiation sites and block localization of HDAC1 and HDAC2 to DNA-damage regions.

    “Class I/II HDAC inhibitors suppressed H3K56 deacetylation at sites of laser micro-irradiation and also blocked the localization of HDAC1 and HDAC2 to DNA-damage regions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Class I/II HDAC inhibitors TSA and NaB specifically inhibit HDAC1/2 deacetylase activity.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Human diploid fibroblasts exhibiting oncogene-induced senescence due to RAS over-expression display decreased H3K56Ac and H3K56Ac exclusion from DNA-damage sites.

    “human diploid fibroblast exhibiting OIS due to RAS over-expression32-34 displayed decreased H3K56Ac compared to control cells, as well as H3K56Ac exclusion from DNA-damage sites”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] Bartkova, J. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444, 633–637 (2006). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Di Micco, R. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444, 638–642 (2006). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] Serrano, M., Lin, A.W., McCurrach, M.E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S.W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The loss of H3K56Ac signal at DNA-damage sites reflects deacetylation of H3K56 rather than histone eviction or epitope masking.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sirtuin inhibitor nicotinamide or depletion of SIRT1 and SIRT2 causes little or no increase in H3K56Ac or H4K16Ac.

    “when we treated cells with the Sirtuin inhibitor nicotinamide or depleted cells of SIRT1 and SIRT2, little or no increase in H3K56Ac or H4K16Ac was observed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Broad specificity HDAC inhibitors sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging treatments.

    “broad specificity HDAC inhibitors are promising anti-cancer drugs that sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging treatments24,27,28”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [24] Glozak, M.A. & Seto, E. Histone deacetylases and cancer. Oncogene 26, 5420–5432 (2007). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Smith, K.T. & Workman, J.L. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: anticancer compounds. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 21–25 (2009). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] Camphausen, K. & Tofilon, P.J. Inhibition of histone deacetylation: a strategy for tumor radiosensitization. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4051–4056 (2007). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The effects on H3K56Ac are specific because H3K14Ac did not decrease at either DSB site, while γH2AX was increased.

    “the effects on H3K56Ac are specific because H3K14Ac did not decrease at either DSB site, while γH2AX was increased”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    HDAC1/2 depletion does not affect the amount of DNA damage produced by DSB-inducing agents but impairs DNA repair.

    “Collectively, the above data suggested that HDAC1/2 depletion or inhibition does not affect the amount of DNA damage produced by DSB-inducing agents but, rather, impairs DNA repair.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Analysis of p53 acetylation revealed that nicotinamide was effective in the assays.

    “analysis of p53 acetylation, a known Sirtuin target40,41, revealed that nicotinamide was effective in our assays”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] Luo, J. et al. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell 107, 137–148 (2001). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] Cheng, H.L. et al. Developmental defects and p53 hyperacetylation in Sir2 homolog (SIRT1)-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10794–10799 (2003). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    HDAC1/2-depleted cells expressed normal levels of core NHEJ factors, ruling out indirect transcriptional effects.

    “HDAC1/2-depleted cells expressed normal levels of core NHEJ factors, thus ruling out indirect transcriptional effects”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Antibody specificities for HDAC1 and HDAC2 were verified.

    “antibody specificities for HDAC1 and HDAC2 are verified in Supplementary Fig. 1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The enhanced accrual of Ku and Artemis at sites of DNA damage upon HDAC1/2 inactivation is not only due to impaired NHEJ but also reflects the NHEJ machinery unproductively spreading onto chromatin flanking the DSB sites.

    “the enhanced accrual of Ku and Artemis at sites of DNA damage that we observe upon HDAC1/2 inactivation is not only due to impaired NHEJ but also reflects the NHEJ machinery unproductively spreading onto chromatin flanking the DSB sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    HDAC1/2 are overexpressed in many cancers.

    “HDAC1/2 are overexpressed in many cancers24”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Glozak, M.A. & Seto, E. Histone deacetylases and cancer. Oncogene 26, 5420–5432 (2007). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Histone acetylation changes following DSB induction occur in a biphasic manner, with rapid deacetylation at sites such as H3K56 and H4K16 promoting NHEJ, followed by histone acetylations that enhance HR.

    “we suggest that histone acetylation changes are likely to occur in a biphasic manner following DSB induction, with rapid deacetylation on sites such as H3K56 and H4K16 occurring to promote NHEJ (possibly by generating a less dynamic “repressed” chromatin state) being followed by histone acetylations that enhance HR”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The loss of H3K56Ac signal at DNA-damage sites reflects deacetylation of H3K56 rather than histone eviction or epitope masking.
15 of 15
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The loss of H3K56Ac signal at DNA-damage sites reflects deacetylation of H3K56 rather than histone eviction or epitope masking.

    “staining for H3K56Ac was diminished at sites of DNA damage containing γH2AX”
    “AsiSI-ER induction decreased H3K56Ac at DSB sites”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The laser micro-irradiation and AsiSI-ER systems produce DNA damage that is representative of physiological DSBs for studying HDAC1/2 recruitment and H3K56 deacetylation.

    “we could detect the recruitment of endogenous HDAC1 and HDAC2, but not HDAC3 or HDAC8, to sites of laser micro-irradiation”
    “AsiSI-ER induction decreased H3K56Ac at DSB sites”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The anti-H3K56Ac antibodies used are specific for H3K56Ac.

    “as detected by two different anti-H3K56Ac antibodies”
    “staining for H3K56Ac was diminished at sites of DNA damage containing γH2AX”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Class I/II HDAC inhibitors TSA and NaB specifically inhibit HDAC1/2 deacetylase activity.

    “TSA and NaB but not nicotinamide, resulted in increased H3K56Ac levels”
    “Class I/II HDAC inhibitors suppressed H3K56 deacetylation at sites of laser micro-irradiation”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • TSA and NaB are assigned to conflicting HDAC inhibitor classes

    Minor

    The paper first identifies TSA and NaB as Class I/II HDAC inhibitors, but later calls the same two compounds Class I/III HDAC inhibitors.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K. M., Tjeertes, J. V., Coates, J., Legube, G., Polo, S. E., Britton, S., & Jackson, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Stephen P
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2010-08-29
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1144-1151
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2008650297
Cited by
629
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 46
FWCI
19.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (086861/Z/08/Z, 086861)
  • Cancer Research UK (11224, A5290)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
HDAC1, HDAC2, histone deacetylase, DNA damage response, DNA double-strand break repair, non-homologous end joining, H3K56 acetylation, histone hypoacetylation, chromatin modification, DNA damage signaling, radiosensitization, histone deacetylase inhibitors, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
DNA Repair, Histones, Humans, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Histone Deacetylase 1, Histone Deacetylase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review