Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Individualized Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence Using a Nomogram

Weiser, Martin R., Landmann, Ron G., Kattan, Michael W., Gonen, Mithat, Shia, Jinru, Chou, Joanne, Paty, Philip B., Guillem, José G., Temple, Larissa K., Schrag, Deborah, Saltz, Leonard B., Wong, W. Douglas·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Estimates of recurrence after curative colon cancer surgery are integral to patient care, forming the basis of cancer staging and treatment planning. The categoric staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) is commonly used to convey risk by grouping patients based on anatomic elements. Although easy to implement, there remains significant heterogeneity within each stage grouping. In the era of multimodality treatment, a more refined tool is needed to predict recurrence. Methods: An institutional database of 1,320 patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer was used to develop a nomogram to estimate recurrence after curative surgery. Prognostic factors were assessed with multivariable analysis using Cox regression, whereas nonlinear continuous variables were modeled with cubic splines. The model was internally validated with bootstrapping, and performance was assessed by concordance index and a calibration curve. Results: The colon cancer recurrence nomogram predicted relapse with a concordance index of 0.77, improving on the stratification provided by either the AJCC fifth or sixth staging scheme. Factors in the model included patient age, tumor location, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, T stage, numbers of positive and negative lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and use of postoperative chemotherapy. Conclusion: Using common clinicopathologic factors, the recurrence nomogram is better able to account for tumor and patient heterogeneity, thereby providing a more individualized outcome prognostication than that afforded by the AJCC categoric system. By identifying both the high- and low-risk patients within any particular stage, the nomogram is expected to aid in treatment planning and future trial design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.14.1291

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Weiser, M. R., Landmann, R. G., Kattan, M. W., Gonen, M., Shia, J., Chou, J., Paty, P. B., Guillem, J. G., Temple, L. K., Schrag, D., Saltz, L. B., & Wong, W. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-01-20
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
380-385
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2119107631
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualized Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence Using a Nomogram. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.14.1291
The paper
Weiser, M. R., Landmann, R. G., Kattan, M. W., Gonen, M., Shia, J., Chou, J., Paty, P. B., Guillem, J. G., Temple, L. K., Schrag, D., Saltz, L. B., & Wong, W. D. (2008). Individualized Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence Using a Nomogram. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.14.1291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.