Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preoperative Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Patients With Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head

Evans, Douglas B., Varadhachary, Gauri R., Crane, Christopher H., Sun, Charlotte C., Lee, Jeffrey E., Pisters, Peter W.T., Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas, Wang, Huamin, Cleary, Karen R., Staerkel, Gregg A., Charnsangavej, Chusilp, Lano, Elizabeth A., Ho, Linus, Lenzi, Renato, Abbruzzese, James L., Wolff, Robert A.·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a phase II trial to assess the outcomes of patients who received preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for stage I/II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with pancreatic head/uncinate process adenocarcinoma and radiographically defined potentially resectable disease received chemoradiation with 7 weekly intravenous (IV) infusions of gemcitabine (400 mg/m 2 IV over 30 minutes) plus radiation therapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks). Patients underwent restaging 4 to 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation and, in the absence of disease progression, were taken to surgery. Results: The study enrolled 86 patients. At the time of restaging, disease progression or a decline in performance status precluded 13 patients from surgery. Seventy-three (85%) of 86 patients were taken to surgery, extrapancreatic disease was found in nine, and 64 (74%) of 86 underwent a successful PD. Median overall survival (86 patients) was 22.7 months with a 27% 5-year survival. Median survival was 34 months for the 64 patients who underwent PD and 7 months for the 22 unresected patients (P < .001). The 5-year survival for those who did and did not undergo PD was 36% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation followed by restaging and evaluation for surgery separated the study population into two different subsets: patients likely to benefit from PD (n = 64) and those in whom surgery would be unlikely to provide clinical benefit (n = 22). Furthermore, the encouraging overall survival observed in this large trial supports the continued investigation of gemcitabine-based preoperative therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.15.8634

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Evans, D. B., Varadhachary, G. R., Crane, C. H., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Pisters, P. W. T., Vauthey, J.-N., Wang, H., Cleary, K. R., Staerkel, G. A., Charnsangavej, C., Lano, E. A., Ho, L., Lenzi, R., Abbruzzese, J. L., & Wolff, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-07-20
Volume
26
Issue
21
Pages
3496-3502
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2117009632
Cited by
731
References
0
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Patients With Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.15.8634
The paper
Evans, D. B., Varadhachary, G. R., Crane, C. H., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Pisters, P. W. T., Vauthey, J.-N., Wang, H., Cleary, K. R., Staerkel, G. A., Charnsangavej, C., Lano, E. A., Ho, L., Lenzi, R., Abbruzzese, J. L., & Wolff, R. A. (2008). Preoperative Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Patients With Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.8634

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.