Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 680

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid Cancer

Open access
Gupta-Abramson, Vandana, Troxel, Andrea B., Nellore, Anoma, Puttaswamy, Kanchan, Redlinger, Maryann, Ransone, Kathy, Mandel, Susan J., Flaherty, Keith T., Loevner, Laurie A., O'Dwyer, Peter J., Brose, Marcia S.·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Given the molecular pathophysiology of thyroid cancer and the spectrum of kinases inhibited by sorafenib, including Raf kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and RET tyrosine kinases, we conducted an open-label phase II trial to determine the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with advanced thyroid carcinoma. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with metastatic, iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. Responses were measured radiographically every 2 to 3 months. The study end points included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and best response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Results: Thirty patients were entered onto the study and treated for a minimum of 16 weeks. Seven patients (23%; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.42) had a partial response lasting 18+ to 84 weeks. Sixteen patients (53%; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.72) had stable disease lasting 14 to 89+ weeks. Seventeen (95%) of 19 patients for whom serial thyroglobulin levels were available showed a marked and rapid response in thyroglobulin levels with a mean decrease of 70%. The median PFS was 79 weeks. Toxicity was consistent with other sorafenib trials, although a single patient died of liver failure that was likely treatment related. Conclusion: Sorafenib has clinically relevant antitumor activity in patients with metastatic, iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma, with an overall clinical benefit rate (partial response + stable disease) of 77%, median PFS of 79 weeks, and an overall acceptable safety profile. These results represent a significant advance over chemotherapy in both response rate and PFS and support further investigation of this agent in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.16.3279

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 680

Metadata

Authors
Gupta-Abramson, V., Troxel, A. B., Nellore, A., Puttaswamy, K., Redlinger, M., Ransone, K., Mandel, S. J., Flaherty, K. T., Loevner, L. A., O'Dwyer, P. J., & Brose, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-10-10
Volume
26
Issue
29
Pages
4714-4719
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2158801409
Cited by
680
References
4
FWCI
49.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.16.3279
The paper
Gupta-Abramson, V., Troxel, A. B., Nellore, A., Puttaswamy, K., Redlinger, M., Ransone, K., Mandel, S. J., Flaherty, K. T., Loevner, L. A., O'Dwyer, P. J., & Brose, M. S. (2008). Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.3279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.