The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification. Because the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) is a postsurgical staging system, a new clinical staging system was required for the INRG pretreatment risk classification system. Methods: To stage patients before any treatment, the INRG Task Force, consisting of neuroblastoma experts from Australia/New Zealand, China, Europe, Japan, and North America, developed a new INRG staging system (INRGSS) based on clinical criteria and image-defined risk factors (IDRFs). To investigate the impact of IDRFs on outcome, survival analyses were performed on 661 European patients with INSS stages 1, 2, or 3 disease for whom IDRFs were known. Results: In the INGRSS, locoregional tumors are staged L1 or L2 based on the absence or presence of one or more of 20 IDRFs, respectively. Metastatic tumors are defined as stage M, except for stage MS, in which metastases are confined to the skin, liver, and/or bone marrow in children younger than 18 months of age. Within the 661-patient cohort, IDRFs were present (ie, stage L2) in 21% of patients with stage 1, 45% of patients with stage 2, and 94% of patients with stage 3 disease. Patients with INRGSS stage L2 disease had significantly lower 5-year event-free survival than those with INRGSS stage L1 disease (78% ± 4% v 90% ± 3%; P = .0010). Conclusion: Use of the new staging (INRGSS) and risk classification (INRG) of neuroblastoma will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Cited by
Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D., Villablanca, J. G., Berthold, F., Burchill, S., Boubaker, A., McHugh, K., Nuchtern, J. G., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177 · Cited by 365
Self-citationPandit-Taskar, N., Zanzonico, P., Staton, K. D., Carrasquillo, J. A., Reidy-Lagunes, D., Lyashchenko, S., Burnazi, E., Zhang, H., Lewis, J. S., Blasberg, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.193169 · Cited by 136
Pandit-Taskar, N., Zanzonico, P., Hilden, P., Ostrovnaya, I., Carrasquillo, J. A., & Modak, S. (2017) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000001752 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Monclair, T., Brodeur, G. M., Ambros, P. F., Brisse, H. J., Cecchetto, G., Holmes, K., Kaneko, M., London, W. B., Matthay, K. K., Nuchtern, J. G., von Schweinitz, D., Simon, T., Cohn, S. L., & Pearson, A. D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-01-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-303
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2147575945
- Cited by
- 1,150
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.16.6876
- The paper
- Monclair, T., Brodeur, G. M., Ambros, P. F., Brisse, H. J., Cecchetto, G., Holmes, K., Kaneko, M., London, W. B., Matthay, K. K., Nuchtern, J. G., von Schweinitz, D., Simon, T., Cohn, S. L., & Pearson, A. D. J. (2009). The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.6876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.