The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: More than two decades ago, an international working group established the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) to assess treatment response in children with neuroblastoma. However, this system requires modification to incorporate modern imaging techniques and new methods for quantifying bone marrow disease that were not previously widely available. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a clinical trials planning meeting in 2012 to update and refine response criteria for patients with neuroblastoma. Methods: Multidisciplinary investigators from 13 countries reviewed data from published trials performed through cooperative groups, consortia, and single institutions. Data from both prospective and retrospective trials were used to refine the INRC. Monthly international conference calls were held from 2011 to 2015, and consensus was reached through review by working group leadership and the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting leadership council. Results: Overall response in the revised INRC will integrate tumor response in the primary tumor, soft tissue and bone metastases, and bone marrow. Primary and metastatic soft tissue sites will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and iodine-123 (123 I) –metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans or [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans if the tumor is MIBG nonavid. 123 I-MIBG scans, or [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans for MIBG-nonavid disease, replace technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scintigraphy for osteomedullary metastasis assessment. Bone marrow will be assessed by histology or immunohistochemistry and cytology or immunocytology. Bone marrow with ≤ 5% tumor involvement will be classified as minimal disease. Urinary catecholamine levels will not be included in response assessment. Overall response will be defined as complete response, partial response, minor response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Conclusion: These revised criteria will provide a uniform assessment of disease response, improve the interpretability of clinical trial results, and facilitate collaborative trial designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Brodeur, G. M., Pritchard, J., Berthold, F., Carlsen, N. L., Castel, V, Castelberry, R. P., De Bernardi, B., Evans, A. E., Favrot, M., & Hedborg, F. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1466 · Cited by 2,294
Self-citationThe International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report
Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D. J., London, W. B., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Brodeur, G. M., Faldum, A., Hero, B., Iehara, T., Machin, D., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.6785 · Cited by 1,910
Self-citationThe International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report
Monclair, T., Brodeur, G. M., Ambros, P. F., Brisse, H. J., Cecchetto, G., Holmes, K., Kaneko, M., London, W. B., Matthay, K. K., Nuchtern, J. G., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.6876 · Cited by 1,150
Self-citationAdvances in Risk Classification and Treatment Strategies for Neuroblastoma
Pinto, N. R., Applebaum, M. A., Volchenboum, S. L., Matthay, K. K., London, W. B., Ambros, P. F., Nakagawara, A., Berthold, F., Schleiermacher, G., Park, J. R., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.4648 · Cited by 911
Self-citationBrisse, H. J., McCarville, M. B., Granata, C., Krug, K. B., Wootton-Gorges, S. L., Kanegawa, K., Giammarile, F., Schmidt, M., Shulkin, B. L., Matthay, K. K., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11101352 · Cited by 520
Self-citationRECIST revisited: A review of validation studies on tumour assessment
Therasse, P., Eisenhauer, E. A., & Verweij, J. (2006) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.026 · Cited by 422
Ambros, P. F., Ambros, I. M., Brodeur, G. M., Haber, M., Khan, J., Nakagawara, A., Schleiermacher, G., Speleman, F., Spitz, R., London, W. B., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014 · Cited by 404
Self-citationBerthold, F., Boos, J., Burdach, S., Erttmann, R., Henze, G., Hermann, J., Klingebiel, T., Kremens, B., Schilling, F. H., Schrappe, M., et al. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70291-6 · Cited by 402
Self-citation
Cited by
GD2-CART01 for Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Del Bufalo, F., De Angelis, B., Caruana, I., Del Baldo, G., De Ioris, M. A., Serra, A., Mastronuzzi, A., Cefalo, M. G., Pagliara, D., Amicucci, M., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2210859 · Cited by 561
Geoerger, B., Kang, H. J., Yalon-Oren, M., Marshall, L. V., Vezina, C., Pappo, A., Laetsch, T. W., Petrilli, A. S., Ebinger, M., Toporski, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30671-0 · Cited by 357
Self-citationCho, H. W., Lee, J. W., Ma, Y., Yoo, K. H., Sung, K. W., & Koo, H. H. (2018) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e260 · Cited by 20
Ek, T., Ibrahim, R. R., Vogt, H., Georgantzi, K., Träger, C., Gaarder, J., Djos, A., Rahmqvist, I., Mellström, E., Pujol-Calderón, F., et al. (2024) · Cancer Research Communications · doi:10.1158/2767-9764.crc-24-0338 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D., Villablanca, J. G., Berthold, F., Burchill, S., Boubaker, A., McHugh, K., Nuchtern, J. G., London, W. B., Seibel, N. L., Lindwasser, O. W., Maris, J. M., Brock, P., Schleiermacher, G., Ladenstein, R., Matthay, K. K., & Valteau-Couanet, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-08-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2580-2587
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2611071372
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177
- The paper
- Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D., Villablanca, J. G., Berthold, F., Burchill, S., Boubaker, A., McHugh, K., Nuchtern, J. G., London, W. B., Seibel, N. L., Lindwasser, O. W., Maris, J. M., Brock, P., Schleiermacher, G., Ladenstein, R., Matthay, K. K., & Valteau-Couanet, D. (2017). Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
